The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3659 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 January 2026
Mark Ruskell
Will there be a big difference between—
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 January 2026
Mark Ruskell
You think that producing 15 billion barrels is compatible with the ambitions in the draft climate change plan and that we should revise all the estimates and go for that.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 January 2026
Mark Ruskell
David Whitehouse spoke about potentially producing 15 billion barrels, going beyond known reserves and looking at future reserves and exploration drilling. Is that compatible with addressing climate change? If every country in the world that had oil and gas reserves adopted the same approach, would we not find it difficult to meet the terms of the Paris agreement, or should we just think of ourselves and say, “That’s fine”?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 January 2026
Mark Ruskell
With the right financial incentive.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 January 2026
Mark Ruskell
The panel has already covered some of the aspects of CCS and the Acorn project. John Underhill explained some of the complexities around investment in that and the vulnerability around it. Do you have any other comments in relation to CCS and its effectiveness in decarbonising?
The climate change plan is heavily reliant on Acorn. What are your thoughts on the risks to the climate change plan and decarbonisation if Acorn does not go ahead? I invite witnesses to come back with any additional comments in relation to that. Adam, do you want to come in?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 January 2026
Mark Ruskell
John Underhill, can I bring you back in on CCS? In the plan, there is a reliance not only on potential carbon capture at Peterhead but on capturing emissions from energy-from-waste plants, which are dispersed across Scotland—the figure that I have in front of me talks about 45 per cent of emissions from energy-from-waste plants being captured by 2032. Building on your existing comments, do you have anything further to say about the vulnerability around CCS?
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 January 2026
Mark Ruskell
I am very pleased about what was announced in the budget yesterday—I have been calling for such a fund for many years. However, given that the plant is scheduled to close in four weeks’ time, communities need to know when the fund will be up and running. While £3 million is a good starting point, it does not fully address the problems that are left behind by ExxonMobil’s decision. There must be a full positive legacy for both communities and workers.
What steps will the Government be taking to help leverage more funds, not just from the UK Government but from ExxonMobil, which made substantial profits from the operation of Mossmorran over many decades?
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 January 2026
Mark Ruskell
Anyone who has attempted to turn north on to the A9 at Dunkeld will recognise the absolute road safety nightmare that is faced by communities day in, day out. Although I welcome the mention of that junction in the statement, what is proposed falls way short of what the communities have campaigned for over many years. They want a roundabout and permanent speed reduction on the A9. What reassurance can the cabinet secretary give that the improvements that the communities want will be delivered and that we will end up with a safer road rather than just a faster road?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 6 January 2026
Mark Ruskell
I am interested in the witnesses’ views on the circular economy strategy and how that links with the climate change plan. Is there consistency there, or are there things that do not quite read across between the two?
I am also interested in hearing your brief comments about the circular economy strategy. I know that there is a focus in the strategy on sector-specific road maps—do you welcome that? Do you feel that some things are ambitious, too ambitious or unambitious? I would like to hear a couple of points from each of you.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 6 January 2026
Mark Ruskell
One of the challenges that we have, particularly in this committee, is that we are trying to scrutinise this plan for the very short period of time of the 120 days that is in front of Parliament. I am interested in what is missing from the plan, because the Government could go back to it after 120 days and say, “You know what, we’ve had evidence to show that this or that intervention or policy would make sense and would help to deliver the targets in a more effective way.”
Particularly in relation to questions such as what local authorities and national Government can do with regard to budgets and changes in legislation, how we create the environment for that modal shift, particularly in urban areas where we have that massive population and we can get those health benefits—not to exclude rural areas—do you think that specific things are missing from the plan in its draft stage? I invite you to come back in and perhaps identify a couple of things that you think are clearly missing, particularly in relation to the modal shift—unless you think that it is all here, but it is about emphasis.