The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3014 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
If Wales is granted an internal market act exemption, it will be somewhat bittersweet for you and for the Scottish Government, but would it provide a route for you to come back at some point and include glass within a UK and Scottish scheme?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
Can I pick up on the council issue before you bring Haydn Thomas in? My understanding is that the inclusion of glass in the DRS would have meant that many councils could have wound down or reduced their kerbside recycling operations and saved money as a result. Are you expecting any changes due to councils having to maintain glass recycling—at a cost to them, because they do not make a profit from it—as a result of glass not being included? I am interested in where the cost will arise. Will it come to local authorities or will the extended producer responsibility kick in, with local authorities getting money for running such schemes? They will still have to collect and deal with what is a bulky, expensive and difficult-to-handle material.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
Okay. Haydn, will you comment on the economics of the exclusion of glass?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
Yes. I read Scotland Against Spin’s response to the committee. I think that it was possibly the only group that actually submitted evidence. I recognise that there is a concern.
I wanted to ask for your view, cabinet secretary, on whether the good practice principles on community engagement are already being adhered to or whether you can point to examples of where developers are not engaging early on with communities, not doing a pre-application consultation, not holding exhibitions, and not gathering feedback on a development application and then offering feedback to those who have put in their views as to whether, as a result of those views, changes are being made or rejected. I am interested in the development process, how communities get involved very early on and how their views are respected.
Is the current voluntary system working, or are you coming across developers who are ignoring or bypassing it and saying, “It’s fine, we will just get through with very limited consultation”? Is good practice happening widely across the industry, or is that not happening, which is why you are bringing a mandatory requirement?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
Caroline, do you want to come in on that question as well?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
My next question follows on from that, because the purposes for which the proposed power can be used, which are outlined in sections 3(a) to 3(f), are extremely broad. Under section 3(c), it can be used
“to ensure consistency or compatibility with other legal regimes”.
Emily Johns has already mentioned the regime under the Electricity Act 1989. I am interested in any other views on that. When it comes to environmental assessment and the habitats regulations, what would be an ideal system? Can we get a view from the property and housing sector?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
I can certainly see how that element—that is, how the individual knew the person in question or recognised that the dog was an assistance dog—would be a central part of the consideration of such a case.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
Theft of assistance dogs is incredibly rare, but the committee has had evidence from the Law Society of Scotland and the Crown Office that its impact can be taken into consideration in sentencing. What is your response to that evidence?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
I will direct this question initially to Emily Johns. It is about what really needs to be fixed. You described the two separate, although related, regimes of environmental outcome reports and the regime that we have here for onshore infrastructure. What changes, if any, would you like the bill to make to the EIA legislation and the habitats regulations? Does the system that we have at the moment broadly work in facilitating development, as Caroline McParland suggested?
The view of the Government is that we are really going to struggle to meet our offshore wind ambitions without some changes, but I am struggling to see what the changes should be and where the good practice is in the UK or in other regimes. I know that you are not here to speak for the entire renewable energy industry—it is a shame that we do not have anybody here from Scottish Renewables or that sector—but perhaps you can attempt to field that question.
10:45Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
That is fine.
My final question is for Caroline McParland. The existing system of environmental assessment within European law has functioned for 30 or 40 years. I want to get a sense from those who carry out environmental assessments in industry, and from your clients, of how beneficial it is to have certainty in the system. Is the system a well-used one that people understand? Are people satisfied that, broadly, the current system does what it is intended to do, or is there a real appetite for changing it and reform?