Seòmar agus comataidhean

Yes, that is great—thank you.

I will go on to ask you about the BBC’s response. It has said that it has jazz programmes on Radio 2 and Radio 3, and that it can incorporate Scottish emerging talent into those programmes. I had a chance to look at the past month of output that is currently on BBC Sounds. I looked at all the track listings for the jazz programmes, but I did not see Fergus McCreadie, Georgia Cécile or any Scottish artists in any of them. Is there something problematic about the formats of those programmes on Radio 2 and Radio 3 that makes it hard to reflect that ecosystem of Scottish talent that we have talked about?

I guess that this question is for all of you, but I will go back to you first, Professor Smith. I stumbled across “Jazz Nights”—I am not usually awake in that dead zone on a Sunday night—and I am glad that I did. Can we do more to promote that digital linear content through BBC Sounds? There is a lack of awareness of the three programmes that are up for cuts at the moment, which is a shame, because we are missing something if we do not know that those programmes exist.

Many of us are on a musical journey and we are trying to learn about new genres and wake ourselves up to new talent, but it is often difficult to find those programmes. They are not obvious—stumbling across them is not easy.

That is particularly helpful if, like me, you do not have a musical education.

Some MSPs have claimed that operating kerbside collections alongside the DRS would make Scotland unlike any other country in the world. Are those claims accurate? How would the minister like councils to respond to the DRS?

To ask the Scottish Government what progress has been made toward increasing the availability of longer-term housing options for displaced people from Ukraine using the £50 million Ukraine longer-term resettlement fund. (S6O-01919)

Having somewhere safe to live is an absolute necessity for every displaced person who is rebuilding their life here in Scotland, free from war, persecution and violence. However, over recent weeks, we have seen horrific racist attacks on people seeking asylum who are living in hotels, which have been whipped up by far-right agitators and hostile language in Westminster. Will the cabinet secretary update me on what the Scottish Government is doing to protect people seeking refuge from far-right attacks?

Will the member give way?

Will the member take an intervention?

Will the member take an intervention?

I would simply say to Mr Bibby that he needs to read the Bute house agreement, which is clear about the commitments on the A9 and the A96.

The latest estimate has every single mile of the A9 dualling project costing between £19 million and £23 million just for construction, so that does not include management of the project or even buying the land. It is an eye-watering amount of money. Therefore, the biggest challenge to dualling every single last inch of the A9 does not come from Green arguments; it is about the financial reality that the Government faces.

Some Governments—I point out to Mr Bibby that most notable among them is the Labour Welsh Government—are starting to make difficult choices. The Welsh Government is listening to its Future Generations Commissioner and the National Infrastructure Commission for Wales, and it is abandoning vast road-building programmes and investing in other transport priorities that benefit people and the climate.

When I think of the transport challenges in the Highlands and Islands and the very real need for investment, I think of ferries, harbour infrastructure and fixed links. I think of the need to keep lifeline roads open, such as the Rest and Be Thankful. I think of the desperate need to dual the Highland main line and the investment that is needed in rail freight to get timber lorries off the roads. I think of the safety issues that we have on roads such as the A85, which can never be dualled. I think of all that, and I wonder what a further £1,400 million would deliver for all those communities.

For the A9, we absolutely need improvements—the status quo will not do—but safety improvements must come first. The recent spate of tragic fatal accidents on the A9 has happened for a range of reasons, and although dualling might have helped to prevent some of those accidents, we have also seen fatalities on recently dualled sections of the road. Dualling the A9 was never primarily a road safety project but, if we want to maximise the number of lives saved and accidents avoided across Scotland's road network, including the A9, we need to invest carefully in the right measures. Sections of the A9 dualling will still need to be completed, but investment should not stop there.

That is why I am saddened to see Liam Kerr campaigning against speed cameras on the A96, because they are a cost-effective way of saving lives. However, I credit his colleague Finlay Carson for campaigning for the introduction of speed cameras on the A75.

I have met a number of constituents to discuss A9 improvements. For example, I have met the Birnam and Dunkeld junctions action group, whose calls for safety improvements are important. Progress must be made before the next surge in visitor numbers at the start of the new season. I warmly welcome the fact that our minister, Jenny Gilruth, has acted quickly and decisively on a package that will improve driver safety, focusing first on the Birnam to Dalguise section.