The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2389 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
I will direct this question initially to Emily Johns. It is about what really needs to be fixed. You described the two separate, although related, regimes of environmental outcome reports and the regime that we have here for onshore infrastructure. What changes, if any, would you like the bill to make to the EIA legislation and the habitats regulations? Does the system that we have at the moment broadly work in facilitating development, as Caroline McParland suggested?
The view of the Government is that we are really going to struggle to meet our offshore wind ambitions without some changes, but I am struggling to see what the changes should be and where the good practice is in the UK or in other regimes. I know that you are not here to speak for the entire renewable energy industry—it is a shame that we do not have anybody here from Scottish Renewables or that sector—but perhaps you can attempt to field that question.
10:45Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
That is fine.
My final question is for Caroline McParland. The existing system of environmental assessment within European law has functioned for 30 or 40 years. I want to get a sense from those who carry out environmental assessments in industry, and from your clients, of how beneficial it is to have certainty in the system. Is the system a well-used one that people understand? Are people satisfied that, broadly, the current system does what it is intended to do, or is there a real appetite for changing it and reform?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
Do we need legislation for that?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
For sure. We have had evidence to suggest that, in order to prove an aggravation, it has to be demonstrated that the accused knew that the dog was an assistance dog—in other words, a link must be made between knowing that a dog was an assistance dog and then going on to steal it. What are your thoughts on that? Your intention is, I think, that the aggravation should apply regardless of whether somebody knew that the dog was an assistance dog.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
We will come to part 2 of the bill, on environmental assessment, later, but it strikes me that a huge amount of work has already been done through the environmental assessment process around forestry licence applications and development applications. I am interested in your thoughts on how we make best use of the data that is already out there to help to set targets, monitor progress and guide decision making.
Millions of pounds are being invested every single year in assessment and working out what is happening with protected species and recovery, and with the environmental impact of development, yet I do not get a sense of where all the information and knowledge sits within the bill and in the strategies.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
I would like to hear how, from your perspective, the proposed powers could be used in a way that would be beneficial. We are trying to understand how the powers might be used and how you might wish to have them used. In England, there is a lot of discussion about the changing regimes and the indication that the Government there has given about how it is going to change things. Do you have anything to add on that?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
Basically, does the system work for you in facilitating economic growth?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
Yes. I have a quick question. Tim Dumenil mentioned Mossmorran. How do you see Mossmorran potentially fitting in with the hydrogen options from project willow?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
I think that Professor Andresen was talking about CHP systems that were set up on the back of existing industrial sites, which is quite a niche application.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
Yes. I will bring in Tim Dumenil in a second, but I was struck by something that Lewis Elder said earlier. The potential demand for all the project willow projects would be around 20GW of generation to do the electrolysis and create the hydrogen.
Does that conflict with what you said earlier about blending hydrogen into the gas grid? If we have the demand for a huge amount of power to produce as hydrogen—and potentially we cannot meet all the projects that could be developed through project willow—why would we then want to put it into the gas grid? Surely we should focus the hydrogen production on two or three applications coming out of project willow. Are you making the case for blending hydrogen into the gas grid as a way of pump priming things? If you are, how do you get out of that to use the hydrogen where you really want to put it, which might be in a fertiliser factory or some other form of derivative manufacture where you do not have any alternative but to use hydrogen because electric will not cut it? Does that make sense?