The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3662 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Mark Ruskell
I know, but it is the same point, and he could have answered it by now.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Mark Ruskell
Thank you.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Mark Ruskell
I will pick up the pace, convener.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Mark Ruskell
Is solar in it? Will solar feature?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Mark Ruskell
Let us turn now to the consenting process. We are talking about projects of more than 50MW, which means the involvement of the energy consents unit. I am aware that the ECU has increased its staff capacity, and there was a commitment to reduce the time that it takes to make judgments on consents. Has that had an impact? Are there still significant delays for projects of more than 50MW, or are there signs of the system picking up while, at the same time, maintaining the important involvement of communities and stakeholders in contributing to evidence taking?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Mark Ruskell
Coming back to the climate change plan and the assumptions in it on the roll-out of renewables and the electrification of society in the years leading up to 2045, do you think that the architecture of consenting processes, responsibilities over transmission charging and so on align with the CCP? Are the assumptions in the CCP solid, based on our current planning and consenting architecture, or are there any challenges coming up? Are the assumptions around how much generation capacity we can bring in over the next 10 or 15 years going to stand up, given our situation right now with markets, planning and the rest of it?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Mark Ruskell
Sure. I will probably target this more towards Matthew and Gemma. Should different technologies, such as solar, be required to pay out at a different level, depending on the economics?
With regard to wind farm repowering and life extension, do some of those historical community benefit deals, which were set at maybe £1,000 per megawatt, need to be revisited, perhaps with a £5,000 per megawatt rate or whatever is the current standard? Matthew, could you make some quick points on that?
Then I will probably go to Claire Mack, because I mentioned onshore wind.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Mark Ruskell
They are about the same thing.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Mark Ruskell
Is the level of detail in the strategic spatial energy plan appropriate? The national planning framework is still waiting for the energy strategy and we have council development plans. I have sensed a concern within the industry about planning to the nth degree and going down the route that Wales went down some years ago with technical advice note 8 designing exactly where wind farms should be. Is there an appropriate level of strategic guidance in the spatial energy plan and does it give the industry comfort and confidence? Also, does it give communities an element of knowledge about where energy development is likely to be and the extent of it, without saying, “It’s going to be this wind farm and it’s going to be over there”?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Mark Ruskell
Gemma, do you want to add anything on the back of that?