The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3659 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Mark Ruskell
Thank you.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Mark Ruskell
Thank you.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Mark Ruskell
We need something that speaks to householders about what they can do to cut their bills and their carbon emissions.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Mark Ruskell
I will pick up the pace, convener.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Mark Ruskell
Is solar in it? Will solar feature?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Mark Ruskell
Let us turn now to the consenting process. We are talking about projects of more than 50MW, which means the involvement of the energy consents unit. I am aware that the ECU has increased its staff capacity, and there was a commitment to reduce the time that it takes to make judgments on consents. Has that had an impact? Are there still significant delays for projects of more than 50MW, or are there signs of the system picking up while, at the same time, maintaining the important involvement of communities and stakeholders in contributing to evidence taking?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Mark Ruskell
Coming back to the climate change plan and the assumptions in it on the roll-out of renewables and the electrification of society in the years leading up to 2045, do you think that the architecture of consenting processes, responsibilities over transmission charging and so on align with the CCP? Are the assumptions in the CCP solid, based on our current planning and consenting architecture, or are there any challenges coming up? Are the assumptions around how much generation capacity we can bring in over the next 10 or 15 years going to stand up, given our situation right now with markets, planning and the rest of it?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Mark Ruskell
Sure. I will probably target this more towards Matthew and Gemma. Should different technologies, such as solar, be required to pay out at a different level, depending on the economics?
With regard to wind farm repowering and life extension, do some of those historical community benefit deals, which were set at maybe £1,000 per megawatt, need to be revisited, perhaps with a £5,000 per megawatt rate or whatever is the current standard? Matthew, could you make some quick points on that?
Then I will probably go to Claire Mack, because I mentioned onshore wind.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Mark Ruskell
They are about the same thing.
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Mark Ruskell
If that is the case—I accept that that is a useful clarification—I do not understand why the minister is not supporting amendments 20A and 20B. Amendment 20A would add in the need for population estimates for deer and cull targets, and 20B would ensure that the minister sets out how NatureScot will be funded to meet the requirements of population estimates and cull targets.
Putting deer management on the basis that the independent deer working group requested will require provisions that are much more explicit than those that have been laid out in the bill and in the minister’s amendment 20. That is why, as well as providing the option of amendment 98, which is a lot clearer, I also provided the option of amending the minister’s amendment to make it crystal clear what we are talking about.
18:45