The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2616 contributions
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Mark Ruskell
I welcome the real-terms increase in council funding that is coming through the budget. I hope that that will give the flexibility that Perth and Kinross Council needs to take the closures off the table when it meets next Wednesday. However, it is clear that some councils are continually making the case for rural library closures on the basis that the statutory provision can be met from mobile libraries. Does the cabinet secretary agree that that view fundamentally misunderstands the importance of rural libraries as free and accessible cultural and community spaces? Does he agree that it is time to look again at what should constitute a statutory library service, in particular in the rural context?
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Mark Ruskell
To ask the Scottish Government what discussions the culture secretary has had with ministerial colleagues regarding the potential impact on the provision of library services in Mid Scotland and Fife of the proposed local government settlement for 2025-26. (S6O-04256)
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 January 2025
Mark Ruskell
Leaving aside your comment about the cost of engagement and following the logic of your argument, would that save you money? Instead of having perhaps a speculative housing development on an area of green belt, you would have been able to say, “The community does or does not want this. Therefore, we have done all the consultation. We can go straight into consulting on a land management plan that is driven largely by the local place plan and what the community wants.” I take the point that you did a process that took £70,000 for a couple of days—that is eye-watering—but are you saying that the local place plan sets the agenda and you feed off that and that is a bit simpler?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 January 2025
Mark Ruskell
Thanks. Dennis Overton, you want to come in. Could you also cover the specific Land Commission proposals?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 January 2025
Mark Ruskell
Why, do you think, has the Government gone down this particular route? I think that the original consultation suggested a public interest test on the buyer rather than the transfer test on the seller. I am curious. Do you or any of the other witnesses have views about why the Government has gone down this route, and why it rejected the original proposal?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 January 2025
Mark Ruskell
You see what is in the plan as a summation of work that is already on-going.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 January 2025
Mark Ruskell
Thank you for highlighting the DPLR Committee’s consideration of the bill. Andrew, I sense that you probably want to come in with your thoughts on the public interest aspect.
11:45Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 January 2025
Mark Ruskell
I am asking all the witnesses.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 January 2025
Mark Ruskell
Do you think that it is a problem that a public interest test in relation to transfer of land is not currently included in the bill? There is a transfer test that is applied to the seller, but there is not really anything applied to the purchaser, as a public interest test.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 January 2025
Mark Ruskell
I want to ask about lotting decisions. Megan—I think that you mentioned the Land Commission’s proposals to put the public interest more at the heart of the bill. I will start with you. I am sure that others also have views.