The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2616 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 4 February 2025
Mark Ruskell
Yes. We have heard that point.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 4 February 2025
Mark Ruskell
That is about housing, ultimately, as well as management—
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 4 February 2025
Mark Ruskell
Dr Tara Wight, do you have anything to add to that? Can you hear us?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 4 February 2025
Mark Ruskell
Finlay, do you have any reflections on local place plans?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 4 February 2025
Mark Ruskell
That was an interesting exchange. I note that the bill does not cover the register of controlled interests, but maybe it should—who knows?
Land management planning is obviously a way of delivering openness and transparency. Perhaps I can come to Sandra Holmes first with this question. I am interested in hearing where community consultation is working well, where it is not working well and what the barriers are. After all, what lie at the heart of LMP production are good liaison and good consultation with communities. Can you offer reflections from your perspective on how that can be improved?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 4 February 2025
Mark Ruskell
If that work is already happening under other, more national, strategic plans, is it not just a case of bringing everything together so that people who come along to the village hall, for example, can see where the public interest is?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 4 February 2025
Mark Ruskell
Rob Carlow, do you have anything to add? There is a question about how Gresham House Forest Fund VI LP, as an entity, books a village hall and tells people what it is doing. What is good consultation in that regard?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 4 February 2025
Mark Ruskell
Okay. Related to that is the transfer test. The original recommendation was for a public interest test. You will have heard our earlier witnesses talk about the advantages of that, rather than a transfer test being applied to the seller before sale. May I have your reflections on that? I go to Sandra Holmes first.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 4 February 2025
Mark Ruskell
Yes. Clearly, the land management plans need to reflect the aspirations of people who want to hold land and wider landscape-scale recovery.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 4 February 2025
Mark Ruskell
I want to get your reflections on the ministerial powers over lotting decisions. I will go to Tara Wight first, as she had quite a few reflections on that issue in her written evidence, so it is obviously a concern for her members.