The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2616 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 4 February 2025
Mark Ruskell
Do you see the interests of your clients, in particular those in commercial forestry, as being a version of the public interest? Do they clearly lie within the public interest?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 4 February 2025
Mark Ruskell
You would see the activities that are invested in commercial forestry as being clearly within the public interest. Is that right?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 4 February 2025
Mark Ruskell
It looks like Finlay Clark does not have any final reflections on that point, so I hand back to you, convener.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 4 February 2025
Mark Ruskell
Good morning, everybody. One of the key provisions in the bill is around land management planning. It is fair to say that, although we have seen good community consultation between landowners and communities across Scotland in the past, we have also seen some bad consultation. From your perspectives, where do you think there has been, and what do you think constitutes, good practice in relation to involving and consulting communities on land management? I am not picking on you, David, but given that the John Muir Trust is a landowner, do you want to start?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 4 February 2025
Mark Ruskell
Sarah, I will come back to you briefly. Is anything else missing from the bill? A few anomalies have arisen as a result of the Wildlife Management and Muirburn (Scotland) Act 2024 and they are not covered by the bill that is before us. Are there any loose ends that the bill should cover and which it could include as we move forward?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 4 February 2025
Mark Ruskell
I will pose my question only to Sarah, then.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 4 February 2025
Mark Ruskell
I will bring you in, Rob, on where you see the boundary. We could talk about local place plans and the urban environment, but then all the land management decisions are up in the straths and in the hills and really have little to do with the community. In taking evidence, we have spoken to communities around Aberfeldy, for example—Forestry and Land Scotland is doing a consultation in the surrounding area. There is genuine community interest there in, say, forest crofts, as well as in people taking smaller lots, which might well fit with wider management objectives for forestry in the area. Where do you see local place plans fitting into that?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 4 February 2025
Mark Ruskell
You make a case for a blanket exemption for commercial forestry, but is it possible that there might be an element of seminatural or ancient woodland in a commercial forestry holding that could be lotted off to a community interest or another interest that has a completely different type of objective?
I am trying to think of an example where potentially—it is all about potential—it would make sense for ministers to step in and say that a piece of land could be brought into wider conservation. It might not be relevant to the restructuring or commercial development of the forest, but they would see it as a potential lotting decision.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 4 February 2025
Mark Ruskell
Max or David, do you have anything to add?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 4 February 2025
Mark Ruskell
Would you be concerned about reaggregation of land after lotting?