Seòmar agus comataidhean

Thanks. That describes an iterative process and conversation with communities about their needs and the vessels and ports that are required to meet those.

That is me for now, convener.

It is really welcome that there will be an evaluation. It is important that the evaluation is qualitative as well as quantitative. A lot of really impressive figures are being bandied about—the 45 million journeys, and the hundreds of thousands of young people who are joining the scheme—but what lies underneath that? What I am seeing is a massive improvement in the confidence and independence of young people. I do not think that anybody really predicted that when the scheme was first discussed. I wonder whether any evaluation will also look behind the numbers at the impact on young people, and on families and communities, because it feels as though there is a story there that is not really being told.

Okay—so your involvement with Transport Scotland is primarily about the assets. You would not pass comment on the viability of fixed links, for example, or any other issues that are relevant to connectivity for islands; your activity is just about the ferries and ports.

I want to go back to a lived-experience issue that a number of islanders have told us about. Access to urgent last-minute ferry services is a particular frustration, whether it is needed for medical appointments or for another reason. Is there scope for Transport Scotland to change the contractual requirements so as to allow islanders more access to the vital lifeline services and slots that they need?

Okay, but you will be aligned in 2045. Is that what you are saying?

That is in the context of current contractual arrangements. Is there a need to review those contractual arrangements, or is there enough flexibility within them?

That sounds like a commonsense approach to need, which is important.

Looking at the future, I am interested to know what role CMAL has played in relation to the development of the islands connectivity plan. It would be good if you could explain exactly what your involvement has been throughout the stages of its development.

Can you explain what that involvement has been with Transport Scotland?

Your point is interesting, Jim. You seem to be saying that CMAL is following a market rather than trying to create and lead a new market in decarbonised technology. It is a bit disappointing to hear that.

Is CMAL committed to the 2030 target, which is a 75 per cent carbon reduction on 1990 levels by 2030? Are all the decisions that have been made on commissioning in perfect alignment with that? If not, you are in effect asking another transport sector—another part of the economy—to pick up the slack on decarbonisation that, for whatever reason, you feel that you are unable to achieve.