Skip to main content

Language: English / Gàidhlig

Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 24 December 2024
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 1816 contributions

|

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Petitions

Meeting date: 28 June 2022

Mark Ruskell

The petition was very timely. We have seen some progress from the Government in relation to translocations; the first licensed translocations have taken place, which is very welcome. However, there will be on-going issues with the national beaver strategy that need some scrutiny. I suggest that we close the petition but also that we keep one eye on the national beaver strategy. If there is an opportunity to scrutinise that when it is launched, it would be very useful for us to do so, because it will bring up a lot of questions about the management of beavers, including translocations. I think that that is the best way to proceed with the issues that the petition raised.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Ferry Service Inquiry

Meeting date: 28 June 2022

Mark Ruskell

Joe Reade raised the issue initially. Do you think that RET should go?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Ferry Service Inquiry

Meeting date: 28 June 2022

Mark Ruskell

We have heard some razor-sharp evidence this morning. It has certainly been educational.

Joe Reade said that there was not really a strategic plan when it came to the introduction of road equivalent tariff. I can see witnesses nodding. How should a strategic plan for road equivalent tariff have been introduced? What would its key features have been? Sam, you were nodding, so I will come to you first.

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee

Channel 4

Meeting date: 23 June 2022

Mark Ruskell

We have heard some pretty sobering thoughts from the panel already. I turn to the international work that Screen Scotland does. Obviously, we will see increased investment in Screen Scotland for its international engagement work. How would the privatisation of Channel 4 affect that?

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee

Scotland’s Census

Meeting date: 23 June 2022

Mark Ruskell

If you had to sum it up in one word, would you say that there was a sense of fatigue?

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee

Channel 4

Meeting date: 23 June 2022

Mark Ruskell

I ask Nicole Kleeman for her reflections on the international work.

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee

Channel 4

Meeting date: 23 June 2022

Mark Ruskell

What would be the impact of privatisation on those international sales?

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee

Channel 4

Meeting date: 23 June 2022

Mark Ruskell

Can I just confirm that, as you said earlier, there is no impact assessment from the UK Government of the pros and cons and of issues to do with international work?

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee

Channel 4

Meeting date: 23 June 2022

Mark Ruskell

Thank you for joining us this morning. We heard from the first panel about the status of Channel 4 overseas, the high regard that the channel and its productions are seen in and how the independent sectors are a key driver of that success. I wanted to ask you the same question that I asked the first panel: how might privatisation affect that international work and that international standing of the channel and what it produces?

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee

Scotland’s Census

Meeting date: 23 June 2022

Mark Ruskell

I appreciate the technical nature of the evidence this morning and, as you said, it was a technical decision to delay rather than a political one. Most of my questions have already been answered, but I wanted to pick up on one thing that Paul Lowe alluded to earlier, around changing attitudes in society towards these censuses. Could you expand on that? Did I pick you up correctly that there may be a changing attitude?