The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2616 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Mark Ruskell
We have taken evidence from a range of communities that have developed local place plans. It is clear that there is a relationship between what is in the wider land management plan, what could be in the local place plan and what is actually taking place in that surrounding community, particularly in the built environment. Do you see a role for local place plans in the bill, and should they be specifically mentioned in relation to LMPs? We would not want a situation in which a land management plan that is not really binding on the landowner is developed in one space and a local place plan is developed in another space and for those not to meet up.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Mark Ruskell
I am struggling to see how that can be enforced. You are saying that it is, in effect, a public interest test, but it is not applied to the owner of the land. How would the public interest be carried through to future plans for an estate? Would that be done through land management plans? I am struggling to see how the public interest would be considered if the test is to be applied retrospectively, at the point of sale, on the person who is selling the land.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Mark Ruskell
Are you able to predict what the demand on your resources will be? You can strategise and say, “These look like the areas where we’re going to be asked to do more work,” but there might be new and emerging areas that have not yet been scoped out.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Mark Ruskell
Another point that stakeholders have raised is that the bill does not provide a procedure to calculate compensation for game damage. I am interested in hearing more details on that.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Mark Ruskell
My first question is about the provision in the Agricultural Holdings (Scotland) Act 1991 on compensation for landlords where tenants plant trees. That often includes the cost of returning the land to agriculture. I see in my notes that that is covered in section 45A of the 1991 act. That issue that has been raised with me by tenants in my region for a number of years. Do you have any thoughts on whether that issue could be rectified in the bill?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Mark Ruskell
Yes, and whether they have the ability to discharge those rights to the extent that they can mitigate the damage.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Mark Ruskell
So, diversity is good.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Mark Ruskell
I know that my colleagues want to come in on other aspects of the land management plan, so I will pass back to the convener.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Mark Ruskell
It comes back to my earlier point about what it looks like from the perspective of communities. If you turn up to a village hall, you want to see where the future housing sites are, but you also want to know what is happening with the land that surrounds the community and where those options are.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Mark Ruskell
There needs to be a joined-up picture that people can input into, rather than many complicated consultations that do not mean anything to anybody.