The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3120 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 January 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Last, and certainly not least, I will bring in Jane Morrison-Ross.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 January 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Indeed.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 January 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Craig, do you want to come in on that?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 January 2025
Kenneth Gibson
I hope that it will work better and all.
I have a question that I would like our guests to think about; they do not have to answer it. An issue that is debated back and forth in the public domain is that of where the £60 billion-plus budget should be spent. I imagine that all the organisations that are represented here would like to receive an increase in the funding that is available to them. Garry McEwan has been very direct about that, no doubt because of the 25.5 per cent real-terms cut that his organisation has endured over the past decade.
If you would like your organisation to receive an increase in funding, could you say how much additional funding it would be appropriate for it to receive for the forthcoming financial year? In addition—this is the $64 million question, which you may or may not want to answer—if it is your position that your organisation needs extra money, please say where that money should come from. Have you identified where in the Scottish budget it should come from? Alternatively, should it come from additional taxation? I do not want everyone simply to say, “Aye, just give us more money.” That will not help us in any way, because we still have the same budget. If anyone has anything to say about where they think that money could be redirected from, I would be happy to hear from them. Do not all rush at once.
I see that Mary Morgan and Garry McEwan would like to respond—that is good.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 January 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Everyone agrees that organisations should have longer-term funding across the board. I was asking whether there is anything that you think that you should receive additional funding for now and where that should come from, or whether you support reduced taxation and reduced funding.
I am not asking you specifically; I am asking a general question.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 January 2025
Kenneth Gibson
I call Liz Smith to be followed by John Mason.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 January 2025
Kenneth Gibson
In your submission, you talk a lot about digitisation of data and so on, so I was going to ask you a specific question about that, anyway. What is ROS doing to ensure that the data system, and all your tech systems, are compatible with those in other areas of the public sector? What discussions are you having across public bodies and the public sector on adopting tech that appears, from your submission, to be very innovative?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 January 2025
Kenneth Gibson
It is quite astonishing that we are where we are. In contrast, we might look at the Estonian X-Road system, which is very advanced. It has everyone’s medical records on it, and the police can go into it and liaise with Interpol and various other international police services. Estonia’s system has myriad data, yet in Scotland we are still talking about producing systems that might or might not be compatible with one another. When you think about it, that is astonishing.
Is there any central leadership on that in the Scottish Government? Is there someone who speaks to each of you and says, “This is the system you should adopt and this is the way you should go forward”, or are you more or less left to do it autonomously, through discussions with one another?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 January 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Thank you, and I should also mention that I, too, have a property that I let.
Thank you very much for that opening statement, minister. With regard to the objective here—which, frankly, is to raise money as well as having an impact on first-time buyers—what do you believe the elasticity of demand is? Will the impact on the buy-to-let sector and on second homes be mirrored by the number of people who will buy their first property? I am just creating this example out of thin air, but if there are 100 fewer buy-to-let properties, does that mean, according to the Government’s estimates, that 50 more people will be buying their houses, or will it be 150 or whatever? What is the Government’s thinking on that? How does it look at the impact of this on the sector that it is hoping to boost? What evidence is there that, when the additional dwelling supplement went to 6 per cent, there was a boost to first-time buying?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 January 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Good. That is progress, because that was not the case a year ago. I will let Michael Marra come in, and then a couple of others who are keen to come in.