The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3120 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 January 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Thanks, Liz. I should just say that better scrutiny does not necessarily preclude legislation.
10:15Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 January 2025
Kenneth Gibson
The question is, that motion S6M-15749 be agreed to. Are we agreed?
Members: No.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 January 2025
Kenneth Gibson
I was going to ask specifically about the “Burning platform”, because that phrase intrigued me. When responding to Michael Marra’s question, will you give us a wee bit of background as to what that is? The submission just says that it is
“a compelling case for change.”
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 January 2025
Kenneth Gibson
What sort of hearing are you getting?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 January 2025
Kenneth Gibson
There will be a division.
For
Gibson, Kenneth (Cunninghame North) (SNP)
Greer, Ross (West Scotland) (Green)
Marra, Michael (North East Scotland) (Lab)
Mason, John (Glasgow Shettleston) (Ind)
Thomson, Michelle (Falkirk East) (SNP)
Against
Hoy, Craig (South Scotland) (Con)
Smith, Liz (Mid Scotland and Fife) (Con)
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 January 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Thank you very much for responding to our questions.
10:40 Meeting suspended.Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 January 2025
Kenneth Gibson
The next item on our agenda is to take evidence from two panels of witnesses on the Scottish budget 2025-26. First, we will hear from Stephen Boyle, Auditor General for Scotland; and Fiona Diggle, audit manager, performance audit and best value, Audit Scotland. I welcome you both to the meeting and wish you a happy new year, and I invite the Auditor General to make a brief opening statement.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 January 2025
Kenneth Gibson
How important is transparency in that culture? My experience with Transport Scotland is that transparency is not important at all. For example, I have asked questions for five years on a specific project in my constituency, and the answer that I continue to get—when I ask in the chamber and through written questions and so on—is that Transport Scotland is currently progressing through the necessary governance procedures.
I have asked what those governance procedures are and I am still waiting to hear, three or four years later. Regarding one project, I got told on 17 November 2021 that I would be kept informed. Three and a half years later, I still have not been given an update on that specific project.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 January 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Thank you. The report is excellent and very detailed. It is quite excoriating of the Government in some areas—no doubt we will touch on those in the next hour or so.
One of the issues that you mentioned was transparency. The committee produced a pre-budget scrutiny report for 2025-26, and we just received the response to it on Christmas eve. The section of the response on reform was not impressive, so we will raise the issue of reform with the Government as we progress.
Some of the issues that I was going to ask you about directly are ones that you touched on in your statement, so I will not go over that ground again. However, I will touch on a number of areas that you spoke about. I do not mean to say that what you said is repetitive, but you repeatedly emphasised that you have a number of concerns.
Rather than start at the beginning, let us go into the middle. In paragraph 37 on page 14 of your report, you say:
“Additional spending on pay deals would need to be covered by cutting spending in other areas, re-designing services, reducing headcounts or increasing taxes or charges.”
Do you feel that the Government’s policy on no compulsory redundancies has had an impact on that? The policy was introduced as a one-year policy in 2008 at a time of severe financial cuts due to the financial crash, but it has continued for 16 years. Has it had any impact? I understand that, in some areas of the public sector, there are people who have been redeployed because there is no longer a job for them but they cannot be made redundant.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 January 2025
Kenneth Gibson
That is a “moving swiftly on” answer. However, in terms of transparency, if I ask a specific question about what the governance procedures are, because constituents and community organisations are asking me directly, is it not a courtesy, apart from anything else, to respond and say, “These are the procedures and this is how long it is going to take to wade through them,” rather than just present this blank wall? I have to say that that seems to be unique to Transport Scotland. I am not aware of any other public body where, if I ask a direct question, three or four years later, I still have not had an answer, even though I have asked it at every level that it is possible to ask it at.