The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3120 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Okay, but I am wondering why the figure is £150 million to £200 million and not £150 million, £160 million or whatever. It does not seem to be a specific figure; it is just a pretty vague sum of money—
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Kenneth Gibson
It just seems interesting that the child disability payments budget is £67.9 million up from what was anticipated but the adult disability payment budget is £98.7 million down. Have they changed the age at which people qualify for those benefits? That is almost what it looks like.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Indeed—I think that we can see that straight off; I am just wondering what the percentage is. I would be pleased to receive that information, if possible.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Kenneth Gibson
I notice that the Sheku Bayoh inquiry is going to receive another £1.6 million. My understanding is that it has received £23.8 million up to 31 December last year. Do you have any idea what the total cost is likely to be? Are there any parameters for that?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Thank you very much, minister, for answering our questions.
Agenda item 2 is formal consideration of the motion on the draft regulations. I invite the minister to speak to and move motion S6M-16306.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Kenneth Gibson
I know—I am not asking the Scottish Government to phone up a company at the beginning of March and say, “We’ve three weeks to spend this money. Is there anything that you can spend it on?” However, surely if you know what is going to happen some months ahead—as you clearly did, given that these figures were prepared weeks ago—you have an opportunity, even in the middle of the year, to see where you are with capital projects and whether reallocations can be made slightly earlier to ensure that we optimise the use of capital money.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Kenneth Gibson
No bother. I call Michael Marra, to be followed by Craig Hoy.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Why has £60 million of that figure been allocated to the health and social care portfolio?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Kenneth Gibson
In the social justice portfolio, an extra £117.8 million has had to be allocated. I realise that that is demand led, but it seems that child disability payments are particularly high, at some £67.9 million, which is well over half of that figure. Is there any reason why there seems to have been an underestimate of what the portfolio was likely to need?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Kenneth Gibson
I do not think that there is any doubt about that, and I think that everyone would accept that. The issue is about minimising those fluctuations and ensuring that we do not have big fluctuations in specific areas of social security. We are not talking about a 1 or 2 per cent variation in the budget—although, given the size of the budget, that in itself would be of concern. We want to know why one specific area of social security spending is much higher than was anticipated when others are more or less on an even keel or even slightly less than was anticipated.