The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 604 contributions
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 March 2025
Keith Brown
This has been a really interesting discussion, even though it is probably not completely aligned with the nature of our inquiry.
I first came across the Alice and Humpty Dumpty quote in A level politics, not in literature. I do not think that that means that Humpty Dumpty was a politician, but perhaps Lewis Carroll was. The quote is something like, “When I choose a word, it means exactly what I want it to mean,” or words to that effect.
If we have to choose how we regulate, surely one of the fundamental things is that we should take a rights-based approach. We should all know when AI is being used, and we should have some explanation of how it is being used—in theory, even if we do not understand it—at the point at which we consume it. I realise that that is more difficult in the security space, but it applies generally.
I should say that the convener mentioned that she and the deputy convener are on the EU-UK Parliamentary Partnership Assembly, and I am on the Council of Europe, and those bodies discuss the issue quite a lot.
Especially if we have platforms that are produced elsewhere and we are trying to overlay a regulatory system on those, surely individuals must have the right to know when and how AI is being used.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 March 2025
Keith Brown
Could you not interrupt me when I am asking my question?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 March 2025
Keith Brown
I do not need clarification; I am fine with—
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 March 2025
Keith Brown
I do not need your clarification.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 March 2025
Keith Brown
I never said that. You have just made a false statement, convener.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 March 2025
Keith Brown
This is what happens when you interrupt people in the normal course of the committee’s business.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 March 2025
Keith Brown
Is it possible—I will let you answer fully without interrupting—that you could say one or two things about the strictures that you are observing in relation to ethical appointments? What is the rationale for your doing so? There seems to be a gap in the committee’s knowledge of what the requirements are in relation to ethical appointments.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 March 2025
Keith Brown
Good morning. I should say that I am quite new to the committee, and I am not that keen on being lumped in if statements are made along the lines of, “The committee believes this,” when I have not had a chance to take evidence and make up my mind in relation to the matter. I find the questioning bizarre. I will make a series of observations, and then perhaps you can tell me if any of them are wrong, cabinet secretary.
From the public’s point of view, the situation will be very hard to understand, unless you are an adherent of the idea of the multiverse, where there is an infinite number of universes that you should plan contingencies for. It might make sense in that regard. It seems that you are doing a straightforward thing of ensuring that appointments to a public body—the principle of which was agreed at stage 1 of the Education (Scotland) Bill, I think—are done in an ethical way and are overseen by the relevant regulatory bodies, which is very important in public appointments. That is not something that most people would object to; they will probably be surprised at some of the questioning around it.
The Government has been accused of having an agenda and a direction. I would certainly hope that the Government has an agenda and a direction. Perhaps it is because there are other agendas that we are hearing some of the questioning. What is being done seems to be eminently sensible and not unusual.
On the idea that something might happen at stage 2, I would say that this committee does not make legislation; it is part of the legislative process. It is the Parliament that decides on these things. Of course the Government will have to listen to that.
It seems to be eminently sensible to make provisions now so that you do not lose time. I do not know why anybody would not want to support the proposal; it is very odd to me. The convener seems to be suggesting that the committee might not want to support it, but I would certainly want to support it. I am happy to—
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 March 2025
Keith Brown
I know you interrupt people all the time, convener.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 March 2025
Keith Brown
Are we not allowed to make statements when we ask questions?