The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 657 contributions
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 6 March 2025
Keith Brown
Are there any views on structures that are different from the one outlined by Professor Horsley?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 6 March 2025
Keith Brown
But it would, like the Commission, have to be something that was not an interested party. At the moment, the UK Government has both political and territorial reasons for advantaging one area over another, so that approach would not work. In the past, we all had a say in the Commission, the Council of Europe and the European Parliament—now we do not. This sort of thing is decided at the caprice of the UK Government.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 6 March 2025
Keith Brown
When the OIM representatives were before the committee, it seemed to me that it does not have any real powers at all.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 6 March 2025
Keith Brown
My only other question does not necessarily require a response from everybody. I think it unlikely that political parties thirled to a centralised unitary state in the UK will cede this power voluntarily—that is probably hoping for too much—but, to me, one of the issues seems to be a political one. A UK Government will not want to be overtaken on the outside by Wales or Scotland doing something that is innovative and which takes them ahead of the game. It will not want that for political reasons, and it will dampen it.
More crucial, though, is the point that has been made about business. The one thing that businesses always say, and would say if they were here today, is that they do not like uncertainty. Indeed, Professor Horsley made that point. It is a bit like the planning system; for years, I used to rail against planning officials in my council, because all they would do was wait until somebody put in a design for a house or a development and then say no. Instead of engaging with them and saying, “This is how you can get what you want”, they would just say, “Try your best—and then we’ll usually say no.” That seems to be the space that we are in here, and if that is the space that we are in for businesses or anybody else who is trying to innovate, innovation and ambition will die. That uncertainty, given the sunk costs that one has to take on in order to develop something, is not going to be seen by people as a good prospect.
Is there any other change over and above those that you have already outlined that might help to address that uncertainty for business, even if we are stuck with this regressive legislation? Is there anything else that occurs to you, or have you covered everything already?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Keith Brown
Like Miles Briggs, I am keen to understand the context and what is behind the pressures that are bubbling up. I think that we can all see those pressures, whether they are due to 14 years of—let us say—restrained public expenditure or the pandemic. What is the situation as you understand it with comparison to England and Wales? I know that Newcastle University, the University of Sheffield and a number of others have some problems. What is your understanding of the situation in Scotland as compared with the wider UK?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Keith Brown
My question is simply about what monitoring is done and what data is collected relating to people who move from the armed services into further and higher education. I am not asking about the armed forces covenant in that regard—although I and many veterans are sceptical of its worth—but what data is collected? What relationships are there between the military and further and higher education institutions and associated bodies, particularly in relation to resettlement courses and people moving from the armed services into further and higher education, especially since there are so many early service leavers these days?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Keith Brown
We have been talking about some of the groups that you are getting data on. Is any data collected on, or is there any initiative in relation to, ex-service personnel entering further and higher education?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Keith Brown
Is any of that based on relationships that institutions might have with the armed forces and resettlement schemes, for example?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Keith Brown
You referred to how complicated it can be for young people to make decisions, given the complex landscape and so on, so I was tempted to ask how much more complicated it would be for those aged 14 rather than 17, but I will leave that for another day. I am sure that you will be asked that question in due course.
10:00Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Keith Brown
I am not entirely sure what to expect as an answer to this question—actually, I do. It seems to me that, although, in all sorts of ways, the Government and public authorities were seized by the idea of acting with urgency during the pandemic, we have now dropped back into old ways of working. Is the Government aware of that and guarding against it? I think that the committee is unanimous in thinking that a degree of urgency would be really useful in this matter. I know that there are always competing priorities, but has the Government learned, from the pandemic, lessons about how to move quickly on some issues?