The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 753 contributions
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Sarah Boyack
It is partly about investing to save and partly about the nature of climate change, which is now happening.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Sarah Boyack
I am thinking about those organisations that are under financial pressure. You are asking them to do something more, so the idea of having a duty raises the issue up their agenda while supporting them: they are provided with advice and guidance to enable them to implement change that will actually be beneficial—although that would not be on their agenda. That is the concept.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Sarah Boyack
What would be your alternatives on the sustainable development principles for the 131 public authorities? What would be your alternative approach?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Sarah Boyack
Thank you, convener—I know that we do not have unlimited time.
It has been helpful to get your reflections on the bill, particularly on the areas where the bill could be amended or strengthened. I will go back to the issue of definitions. In the proposal, the concept was to have a definition of the public duty and then a commissioner, which is a logical approach. Sitting alongside that were the Scottish Government’s proposals, which it has now pulled back on. I am interested in your comments about the potential alignment between the national performance framework and the duties in the bill. If the duties were to not be met, there is the issue of accountability and how you increase awareness. Would such alignment strengthen the bill? It is something that I am prepared to consider.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Sarah Boyack
Thank you for that—and thank you, convener: I was able to sneak in that extra question.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Sarah Boyack
I am sold on watching that Channel 4 documentary. Thank you.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Sarah Boyack
That has been really helpful, because it was a nice illustration of the massive opportunities that there are. The scale of the tech is moving so fast, though, and there is the global issue in particular: it does not matter where you live in the world, this is happening now. The issues are about how you regulate, protect data copyright and address that whole identity issue. Then there are trust and ethics. That may be good stuff for us to feed back into the Government’s AI strategy. The tech is moving so fast and we want to benefit but not miss out. That has been very helpful. Thank you.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Sarah Boyack
The LSE report said that AI could be used to nudge people into behavioural change by making them aware of the possibilities.
Sarah Ronald, have you any comments about how we can make sure that that happens?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Sarah Boyack
Several have been suggested for Edinburgh—three, I think. We talked about one out at Heriot-Watt University, but there are conversations about others across the country, so it is not just a one-off thing, and there is a need to link them into energy storage.
The other issue that I wanted to ask about was energy security. At times of extreme weather, for example, the system shuts down in certain places. Is that factored into the thinking around AI? If it suddenly cuts off, what happens?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Sarah Boyack
What you say about joining the artificial intelligence strategy to our thinking about carbon emissions and the potential for energy security challenge is helpful.
I will move on to the issue of culture. We have seen lots of discussions in the news about the impact of artificial intelligence—unintended and otherwise—on the work of artists, musicians and authors, and the fact that data and copyright laws are not keeping up with AI because it is moving so fast. There was also a good report by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, which talked about a north-south divide in terms of access to digital knowledge and skills.
Have any of you thought about the cultural impact? Again, there are potentially big opportunities, and AI could strengthen our cultural and creative industries but, at the same time, there are unintended consequences in terms of a lack of access to digital technology and the issue of AI taking work that has been done by artists, authors, actors, musicians and using it. Have any of you been involved in discussions on that?