Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 17 December 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 836 contributions

|

Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]

Artificial Intelligence (Economic Potential)

Meeting date: 5 November 2025

Sarah Boyack

That is a really good example of opportunities and benefits, but I was also asking about data and copyright issues in terms of protecting artists, musicians and people’s cultural rights. That could be about consent to use what people have created, or it could be about compensation. Would you want to come in on that?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Ecocide (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 4 November 2025

Sarah Boyack

Should that clarification be in the bill or in subsequent guidance? Guidance has been mentioned a few times.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Ecocide (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 4 November 2025

Sarah Boyack

That is why I raised the issue.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Ecocide (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 4 November 2025

Sarah Boyack

We had evidence at the start of today’s session about the lack of enforcement. Do you think that there is no gap here at all? Would having a higher standard persuade some of those organisations not to break the law?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Ecocide (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 4 November 2025

Sarah Boyack

That would be useful, because I am certainly aware of breaches where nothing happens, which has an impact on communities. Do other witnesses have any views on this?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Ecocide (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 4 November 2025

Sarah Boyack

Questions have been raised about a course of conduct and failures that are not just a one-off incident or accident but harm caused over time. I was thinking about repeated failures—pollution in particular—in which existing environmental legislation has been breached but there has been no action and legal accountability has not been triggered. We have existing legislation and we have this bill proposal. Should the bill include the concept of a course of conduct, such as the impact of pollution over time? Would that fill the gap between failures under existing legislation and ecocide? There is a gap here, and no accountability.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Ecocide (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 4 November 2025

Sarah Boyack

One of the points that was made in the earlier questions was about the lack of action in such cases—that such reporting happens, but without any legal consequence for the perpetrators.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Ecocide (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 4 November 2025

Sarah Boyack

Does anyone else have a view?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Ecocide (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 4 November 2025

Sarah Boyack

That is very helpful—thank you.

Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]

Wellbeing and Sustainable Development (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 30 October 2025

Sarah Boyack

Do the witnesses have a view on the suggestion that a new commissioner could have shared back-office functions? Not only would we be learning from the lessons in Wales with regard to efficiency, but we could share knowledge and best practice. We could have memorandums of understanding between existing organisations such as Audit Scotland and existing commissioners, to ensure that work was not being replicated and that we could get maximum impact of any investment in a new commissioner. Who would like to respond to that?