The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 823 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Sarah Boyack
Have I got one volunteer who will be short and snappy?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Sarah Boyack
On the issue of alternative options, the Carnegie UK report contained a range of different ideas, such as having a conveners forum in the Parliament to ask MSPs to do this work.
I spoke with representatives of Audit Scotland, and it would need resource, because it does not have the capacity at the moment. Other suggestions involve a Government-appointed advisory council and an independent round table. Do the witnesses have any thoughts about those alternatives and about the benefits and disbenefits of having a commissioner as a different way of doing things?
It seems not. I could probably ask questions all day, but that might not be tactically smart.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Sarah Boyack
It was about the range of public bodies and the urgency of implementing sustainable development and taking a more joined-up approach to policy coherence. The Christie commission was nearly 15 years ago, and we did not take that forward. It is thinking about that policy coherence and the potential of the proposed commissioner to support the range of organisations that do not have sustainable development or wellbeing on their agendas.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Sarah Boyack
Ellie, do you have any thoughts?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Sarah Boyack
Duncan, do you want to come in?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Sarah Boyack
Would a memorandum of understanding offer an appropriate way to approach that, considering the role of the Children and Young People’s Commissioner Scotland and the human rights angle? I have discussed that issue with Audit Scotland, and it does not have the capacity. What about that idea of having a memorandum of understanding, so that you are clear about whose priorities are what and so that you do not overlap?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Sarah Boyack
Emma?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Sarah Boyack
There is also the Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill on biodiversity. We are passing legislation all the time, and the need for policy coherence comes through very strongly. I will reflect on that.
Do Ellie Twist or Emma Hunter have any comments on that?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Sarah Boyack
I was going to ask about the potential of the commissioner. I am conscious that we have about 131 public bodies in Scotland. We have talked about raising the bar on advice, guidance and investigations, and expecting not just warm words but action—your reflections on the duty to “have due regard” were helpful—and about the extent to which things are changing. If there is an opportunity to support those organisations, will that make a difference? You have talked about somebody needing to do it, and I suggest that it should be the future generations commissioner. Do you have any reflections on that?
I am saying that as an ex-planner, because the world has changed since I was a planner. I taught planners, and it is about how sustainable development keeps up with technological change, science and what is happening on the planet. I am thinking of the commissioner as a resource for different organisations. Is that something that witnesses relate to?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Sarah Boyack
I return to the issue of future savings, how you support organisations and how you enable them to be more efficient, taking a joined-up-thinking approach. Do any of you have any thoughts on that?