The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 514 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Rhoda Grant
What do we need to do?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Rhoda Grant
We have touched on the venison sector during today’s discussion, which is not surprising. People have talked about the costs of deer management and about importing venison, and it seems to me that we are missing a trick. We could use the venison—it is incredibly wasteful not to use it. How can we make sure that the venison is used and gets on to the market in a way that offsets some of the costs without wasting it? It is obscene that a good, healthy source of protein is being left to rot on a hill.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Rhoda Grant
I was not going to sing. [Laughter.]
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 January 2025
Rhoda Grant
Yes.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 January 2025
Rhoda Grant
Could it be done through local authorities that already have those powers?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 January 2025
Rhoda Grant
It has been a very interesting discussion. We heard from the community development companies that they were looking for land in order to retain populations, but the bill covers land at the moment of sale; it does not cover on-going development. Is there something that we could add to the bill to allow communities easier access to assets of community importance? Would compulsory purchase be a vehicle for doing that? If so, who would have the power to do it? Is there anything else that the community development companies suggest could be added to the bill that would apply prior to the point of transfer or sale?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 January 2025
Rhoda Grant
Okay. Laura Hamlet, do you have anything to add to that?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 January 2025
Rhoda Grant
The sequencing is on transfer of the land. Some of the concerns are to do with land that is not being transferred when there is a community development need for land. Why wait until the land transfers? I get that some landowners will enter negotiations with communities, but others will not. The issue is about how you make it happen for those who are in the difficult situation in which the landowner will not enter into discussions with the community.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 January 2025
Rhoda Grant
Yes, indeed—I am thinking about any kind of community development. Housing is the obvious one, but I am also thinking about things such as the development of renewables, which would give an income to a community company, and the development of units for local businesses. The list of what communities might want to develop is endless.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 January 2025
Rhoda Grant
Yes. I want to turn to crofting, which is missing from the bill. Yet again, we have had a lot of discussion about crofting and its impact on land ownership. Should crofting be specifically mentioned in the bill? We have heard that crofters have an absolute right to buy individually. Should the crofting community right to buy reflect that, to make it easier? I am looking at Laura Hamlet, because her company has just bought a crofting estate that is totally made up of crofting land. Should that not have been very easy to do, given the existing powers of crofters?