The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 514 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Rhoda Grant
How will NatureScot approach the control agreements and control schemes under the provisions in the bill? How do the new rules and agreements differ from those in the past?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Rhoda Grant
Okay, so it would not have to be that the deer were damaging the natural environment or biodiversity; it could be that they were causing damage locally. We know that tenant farmers can control deer but only if they catch them on their land. They cannot really go off their tenanted land to deal with the problem. It is the same for communities.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Rhoda Grant
Can you summarise what the legal process will be for setting targets?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Rhoda Grant
Okay. Beyond the scientific advice, what steps would be taken to consult with people who are impacted by the targets, so that we can ensure not only that the targets are met but that there are no negative impacts and that people can have their say before the targets are set? I am thinking about not only stakeholders but also people and agencies who might have to carry out associated work and might face costs.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Rhoda Grant
Can you explain how the powers in the bill can be used to change how European sites are designated? For example, would the power allow the Scottish ministers to make it easier to withdraw the designation of a European site in certain circumstances?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Rhoda Grant
So, you would see the powers being used not to pull back on any of our commitments to nature restoration but to tweak the regime in the face of future changes and to increase our commitments.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Rhoda Grant
My question is similar but slightly different. I hope that it might elicit the response that we are looking for. What is wrong with the current national park legislation that requires the proposed changes to be made?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 February 2025
Rhoda Grant
I will turn to the question that I wanted to ask. The report states that we need urgent action on homelessness, on hunger and on
“quality sexual and reproductive health services”.
Whose job is it to address that? Who should be doing it? Are you seeing any improvements or action to meet those urgent needs?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 February 2025
Rhoda Grant
One issue that I am interested in is the right to food; in fact, I am looking at legislation that will enshrine the human right to food in Scots law. Are there other things that we could be doing now to ensure that people can access their right to food? The issue was mentioned in the report, but how should we go about addressing it?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 February 2025
Rhoda Grant
I have a supplementary question on that last point. I do not think that people expect to get the services that are provided in urban areas or an accident and emergency around every corner; what they expect is services that fit the purpose of rural communities. When services are designed with rural communities, they work.
I do not know how we persuade decision makers to factor in the needs of rural communities. For example, I do not think that people are aware of the new centre for remote and rural health and care, which Emma Harper talked about, because they have seen nothing tangible come out of it—they have not seen service design that fits. Do you have any thoughts on how we push that forward and ensure that the policy makers are aware?