Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Session 6: 13 May 2021 to 8 April 2026
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 896 contributions

|

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 28 May 2025

Rhoda Grant

Alongside that, there are obviously benefits to being in areas where there is greater dispersal. I was in the Faroe Islands recently, where they were quite clear that that could help with issues such as microjellyfish and sea lice. However, they were also clear that it could lead to more escapes, because the waters are more energetic. Is having more escapes a reasonable trade-off, because the farms are further out to sea so, especially with salmon farming, the fish are less likely to interact with wild fish?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 28 May 2025

Rhoda Grant

Would the standards highlighted in section 3(a) be enough to curtail the power and ensure that it was used for the right reasons?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 28 May 2025

Rhoda Grant

Thank you.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 28 May 2025

Rhoda Grant

I asked whether the proposed changes could create a hierarchy of aims for a national park. The legislation as it stands says that all aims are equal unless there is a conflict between them. I guess the concern is that, if you upset that balance, you might end up with a hierarchy of aims, and that could impact on people’s views of a national park.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 28 May 2025

Rhoda Grant

When the bill was initially proposed, there were concerns about local economies, local cultures and the like being secondary to a national park’s main aim, which is to preserve the nature and biodiversity of the park. I see more reluctance or pushback against new national parks than there was when the first legislation went through, when people were keen to have national parks in their area. The issue seems to have become a lot more controversial. Have the aims changed slightly, and has that led to a lack of confidence among those living and working in national parks?

12:00  

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 28 May 2025

Rhoda Grant

I mean the exercise of the subsections being constrained by section 3(a)—that is, that the power could be used only in pursuit of section 3(a).

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 28 May 2025

Rhoda Grant

Yes.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 28 May 2025

Rhoda Grant

I want to ask about regional marine planning. How will the cumulative impacts of developments across marine planning boundaries be dealt with? If we are talking about the area between Cape Wrath and the Mull of Kintyre, for instance, there will be three councils involved.

09:45  

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 28 May 2025

Rhoda Grant

The bill provides for a new overarching power that would allow the Scottish ministers to modify, by regulations, Scottish environmental impact assessment legislation and the habitats regulations. Is that power required, given the existing delegated powers in this area?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 28 May 2025

Rhoda Grant

We have heard evidence to suggest that substantial changes should be made by primary legislation. Can you give us an example of what you think the power would be used for? We have had evidence that they are not needed because there is a huge amount of leeway within the existing regulations to allow us to protect other species, for example. There is a fear that having that power might mean that big changes could be made without proper scrutiny.