The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 897 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Rhoda Grant
Five days is not very long. If someone were away, would there be an opportunity to negotiate a change to that notice period?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Rhoda Grant
On the issue of promotion and of getting local communities eating more venison, do you have any plans to look at infrastructure and at things such as deer larders, chillers or micro-processing units? There are some good examples going on, but what is the Government’s role and what is the Government doing to ensure that more of that happens to get venison into the food chain?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Rhoda Grant
You mentioned that things can change very quickly and that there is a need for flexibility to act to deal with that. Would it be better to have something in the bill about, say, species control areas, whereby, for a limited time, if you saw a non-native species arriving and causing an issue, you could designate an area to deal with it? Such powers could be in the bill but used in a more open and transparent way.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Rhoda Grant
Are you saying that the bill will not bring something new to the table but will pull together various other bits of legislation in order to set targets?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Rhoda Grant
Okay. We have had evidence that we already have that flexibility in the existing regulations. Are you saying that there was that flexibility in the regulations but it is no longer available because of EU exit, or are we getting contradictory evidence on that point?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Rhoda Grant
Having a separation of powers is a well-known way of working—the person in charge of policing something does not make the regulation. If someone does not agree with what is being proposed in discussions that have been carried out in an open forum, how can people trust them to regulate the implementation of that in a transparent way? You say that the NatureScot members on the panels are public officials and they are bound not to work in a detrimental way, but they are still human beings. That is why we tend to have that separation of powers, whereas it feels like there is a real conflict in the proposal that is before us. It is fine if everything is working and everyone is in agreement, but you would not need those panels if everyone was in full agreement. How do you prevent the conflict?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Rhoda Grant
This is off the top of my head—I know that we do not have a great deal of time, convener. Let us say that the advisory panel says that we need to get deer numbers down to five per hectare and NatureScot says that 10 per hectare would be fine. NatureScot would have to police getting that number down to five. What confidence could people have that NatureScot would police that when everyone knows that it thinks that 10 is the right number?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Rhoda Grant
It is just that they can do that on land that they tenant, not on land where excess numbers of deer are having an impact. I am not saying that properly—what I mean is that the deer move about and, if they are not caught in the act, the occupier cannot do anything.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Rhoda Grant
We heard mixed views on whether NatureScot should have a formal role on advisory panels, given that it is also the regulator. What are your reasons for proposing that change, and what safeguards will be in place to prevent any potential conflicts of interest?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Rhoda Grant
Would the bill benefit from the inclusion of a collection of target-setting criteria such as those that were included in the climate legislation, which could set the parameters for those targets? That was suggested by Open Seas.