The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 622 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
Rhoda Grant
Compulsory purchase will always come with a price; it is a purchase. Money would be exchanged, and the rights of whoever held a standard security would be met—there would be money to repay a loan for a piece of land.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
Rhoda Grant
What does the member think is required in the bill to make people take their responsibilities seriously? We all know of landowners whom people are unable to contact, who do not deal with the community and who are a dead hand. Small fines will not bring them to the table. The bill really needs to have teeth. If the member is not happy with the larger fines or compulsory purchase powers, what would he suggest would bring those landowners to the table?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
Rhoda Grant
I will also speak to Mercedes Villalba’s amendments . Do you want me to do that at the same time, or do you want me to leave it to the point at which she will have come in?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
Rhoda Grant
Amendment 345 would expand the bodies that can report breaches to include community bodies, such as community controlled bodies as defined in the Community Empowerment (Scotland) Act 2015, and community councils. Amendment 346 includes the Crofting Commission and grazing committees as bodies that would be able to report breaches of land management obligations.
Amendment 347 pertains to breaches in land management plans. The bill allows for fines to be imposed for breaches of obligations. A large landowner could choose to pay the fines and continue to breach their obligations. The bill does not include further sanctions in that situation. Amendment 347 sets out the parameters for the process of compulsory purchase after five successive years of breaches.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
Rhoda Grant
I was finished, but I will.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Rhoda Grant
It is just that they can do that on land that they tenant, not on land where excess numbers of deer are having an impact. I am not saying that properly—what I mean is that the deer move about and, if they are not caught in the act, the occupier cannot do anything.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Rhoda Grant
Would the bill benefit from the inclusion of a collection of target-setting criteria such as those that were included in the climate legislation, which could set the parameters for those targets? That was suggested by Open Seas.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Rhoda Grant
If we bear in mind that delegated powers already exist in this area, why is a new, single, overarching power needed to enable Scottish ministers to modify Scottish EIA legislation and the habitats regulations?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Rhoda Grant
So, it is about co-ordinating the other pieces of legislation.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Rhoda Grant
Having a separation of powers is a well-known way of working—the person in charge of policing something does not make the regulation. If someone does not agree with what is being proposed in discussions that have been carried out in an open forum, how can people trust them to regulate the implementation of that in a transparent way? You say that the NatureScot members on the panels are public officials and they are bound not to work in a detrimental way, but they are still human beings. That is why we tend to have that separation of powers, whereas it feels like there is a real conflict in the proposal that is before us. It is fine if everything is working and everyone is in agreement, but you would not need those panels if everyone was in full agreement. How do you prevent the conflict?