The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 698 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Rhoda Grant
—or even a few days’ time.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Rhoda Grant
Okay. Thank you.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Rhoda Grant
Okay. Louise, are you going to avoid answering my question like the other three witnesses have? [Laughter.]
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Rhoda Grant
That is really useful. Thank you. Does anyone else want to come in?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Rhoda Grant
We have heard that there is a distinct difference between RO and RME, and that RME should not really be in the bill. Douglas Hutchison also said that he did not think that RO should be a legal requirement for non-denominational schools, and I wonder whether Susan Quinn agrees with that.
I also want to push you a wee bit further on what you mean by that. We have had evidence that, say, nativity plays and the kinds of things that go on in schools around Christmas time can be viewed by people not of the Christian faith or who do not have a Christian background as being very much like RO, with their children being asked to observe Christian traditions that are not part of their own beliefs.
11:15Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
Rhoda Grant
I have a very short supplementary. Do you believe that the management proposals are finely honed enough around each site in relation to what they are looking to protect and what fishing can go on that does not damage that protection?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
Rhoda Grant
Views have been expressed in industry responses to our consultation that gear-specific mitigation and monitoring should be used as alternatives to whole-site restrictions. Are there examples of where that has worked well and has resulted in better protection and restoration of an area? I am putting you on the spot for examples, I know.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
Rhoda Grant
I guess that you are saying that some of the gear-specific measures that are proposed, along with the monitoring of what is being fished in that area, is a new approach, so the science and the knowledge are not in place and we need to monitor that to see what happens.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
Rhoda Grant
In the evidence that we heard earlier, there were examples of decisions taken that have not made a lot of sense to people who were impacted by them: for example, the ban on long lines and gill nets in certain MPAs. I do not want to home in on the one example, but it shows where the concern was. Can we look at more selective management measures in certain MPAs, or how do we monitor whether there is no harm done? David Anderson talked about the sponges and how operators use their long lines and nets on sponges. They say that that has no impact and does not damage them. They have been doing that fishing for 50 years and the sponges are still there, yet they will be banned from doing that. As I say, I am careful not to home in on one case specifically, but I use that as an example.
12:15Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
Rhoda Grant
No.