The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 896 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 16 September 2025
Rhoda Grant
[Inaudible.]
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 16 September 2025
Rhoda Grant
I will very quickly say that I have no relevant interests.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 16 September 2025
Rhoda Grant
[Inaudible.]
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 24 June 2025
Rhoda Grant
The concern that my amendment 382 and other amendments in the group try to address is the unintended consequence where it may be more cost effective for a landowner to resume the whole farm rather than part of it, if they need part of it for development. My amendment is quite simple; it just suggests that the valuation should take that into account. However, I am happy to have further discussions with the cabinet secretary, because I think that we need to sort that out. I am not seeking to constrain the compensation that a tenant would get in any way—it is right that they should be compensated. However, if the unintended consequence is that they lose their whole farm rather than part of it, that is obviously not a good situation to be in. On the understanding that we might have discussions ahead of stage 3 on how to sort out that anomaly, I will not move my amendment.
09:15Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Rhoda Grant
I am afraid to say that I remember the process of the original legislation, and I guess that the four aims were hard fought for in trying to get the balance right. There is an additional focus on different areas through the priorities that are set out in paragraphs (a) to (f) of the proposed new section 1(2) of the National Parks (Scotland) Act 2000, but paragraph (f) is the only one that really looks at people’s wellbeing. All the others look at the area, tourism or climate change—nothing really to do with the wellbeing of people. Could that skew the balance of those aims? Previously, we had four equally balanced aims in which, obviously, the natural environment was a priority. I am wondering whether the new sub-aims could skew the balance.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Rhoda Grant
Given that both national parks raised the issue of housing, do you not think that we should be looking specifically at housing for the local community?
09:15Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Rhoda Grant
To slightly turn this on its head, what are you hoping to gain with the new sub-aims?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Rhoda Grant
Do you think that our national parks have been delivering up till now?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Rhoda Grant
The drivers for reviewing national park legislation were the strategic framework for biodiversity and recognition of the role of national parks in tackling the twin crises. However, many stakeholders have described the changes that are proposed in the bill as “modest”. What impact will part 3 of the bill have on national parks’ ability to contribute to addressing those big societal challenges?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Rhoda Grant
Is there sufficient balance in the proposed aims of the national park between the protection of natural heritage and the sustainable economic development of communities? We have been speaking to the national parks and have learned that their plans were very focused on housing, because there is a degree of need for it, with people not being able to live in the national parks. Do the new aims in relation to the functions of the national park reflect that aspect?