The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 514 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Rhoda Grant
If there are glaring errors in that jigsaw, and if your explanation to us for that is that the matter was not mentioned at ARIOB, but we go to the members of ARIOB and they say, “Yes, it was,” then that is not working. If members of ARIOB are pointing out things that you appreciate, from talking to us, are issues, but you are not hearing it from them, then the arrangements are not working.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Rhoda Grant
I do not want to hog the session, but I have more questions.
To me, that is an indication that ARIOB is not working. The committee is not part of that co-production—maybe we would like to be a part of it—but we are supposed to scrutinise and vote on legislation. It is surely not right that things that are discussed with the industry end up before us as issues.
On the vision, to go back to the jigsaw analogy, most of us look at the picture of the finished thing as we put the bits in place, but in this instance, no one sees that picture as the bits are being placed. That is creating uncertainty in the industry. People do not quite know what the finished product will be.
For instance, we hear a lot about emissions from beef and dairy animal rearing. People who are involved in such rearing do not know what the Government is going to do or what it will encourage, so numbers in animal breeding are falling, which means that we are importing meat from other countries that do not have anything close to our ability to offset carbon.
How can people work with that? Everyone is happy that there is no cliff edge, but they need at least to know the direction of travel so that they can move in that direction. That is missing.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Rhoda Grant
I want to push a little further on that. I totally get where animals are being fed, but a lot of our animals are grass fed—they are on the hill. That is not arable ground; it is different. They are there, and they are providing a nature benefit as well. We have seen that, where livestock numbers have crashed, that has had an impact on the natural environment. How do we get the balance? At some level, having animals grass fed on the hills is providing a nature benefit. What happens if we lose that? There is always a balance between carbon and nature and what we do to protect both.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Rhoda Grant
The seventh carbon budget report identified measures that needed to be taken to lower emissions in agriculture, such as adopting low-carbon machinery and reducing livestock numbers. What measures do you think are the most important and require the most attention from Government when it comes to lowering emissions? Those could possibly be different things, because there might be some easy things that could be done, but also some things that cannot really be done without Government intervention.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Rhoda Grant
Why are we hearing that the system is a blocker on policy direction?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 March 2025
Rhoda Grant
We have recently had a number of statutory instruments from the Government. When we are looking at them and passing them, we get feedback from the industry that it is not happy with them. In defence, the minister says that it was all discussed and agreed at ARIOB and asks why people are now complaining about something that they had full sight of and signed off. We are trying to get to why that happens. Why does the Government think that ARIOB has signed things off? Why does the industry think that it is not being heard?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 March 2025
Rhoda Grant
Can I ask about the process itself? Your working group feeds into ARIOB. Does it formally report back to Government? You talk about there being a lot of discussion, but where does that go? How does it work? How does it feed back in to Government policy?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 March 2025
Rhoda Grant
Can any of you name a tangible difference that ARIOB has made to policy direction?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 March 2025
Rhoda Grant
I will be as quick as I can. The Scottish national adaptation plan highlights how vulnerable agriculture is to climate change, with flooding, drought, diseases and pests coming into the country. What will the impact be if farming does not adapt or if adaptation is not given significant priority? What is the Scottish Government doing to help farmers to deal with those risks?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 March 2025
Rhoda Grant
I have questions about ARIOB. Will the witnesses describe the process that ARIOB follows when advising the Scottish Government about climate change and net zero policy?