Seòmar agus comataidhean

Would it be helpful, then, if the Government were to specify what system can be used, so that technicians or, indeed, replacement parts could be made available at ports? That would allow fishers to slot in something else when they have to send the system away to be fixed. It seems to me that there is an opportunity for the Government, a co-op or an association such as yours to say to fishers that technicians and parts will be guaranteed if everyone uses the same REM system. Is that a solution?

Helen McLachlan, you talked about the process providing those benefits elsewhere. Can you explain how that works in other countries where the system is in place, what benefits come from it and in what way?

After last night, you never know. [Laughter.] We were here until late last night, which is the explanation for that comment.

We have talked about dogs retiring and being rehomed. Do all retired dogs go to a rehoming charity? George Stark, you mentioned that you used to work with a charity in Scotland, and you seemed concerned about that charity.

Is it the same for you, Daniel Alcorn?

Do they adapt quite easily? Does the rehoming centre have to do things to help them to adapt from coming in from kennels to going out to a home?

Can you talk me through the process a wee bit more? You talked earlier about having a 12-year-old dog at home. Which dogs do you decide to keep and which do you decide to rehome? What is the process, and what does the rehoming centre do?

Earlier, you talked about a bond. Was it £200? Given that the dogs are, I suppose, like athletes, they will probably have more complex issues when they retire—with muscles and bones, for example. Does that put people off taking them and rehoming them? Are they more expensive to keep than a dog that would be just a pet all its life?

I have a quick question on the back of that. Given that the commission has still to be set up and given that the plan is still being consulted on, can you tell us what the commission’s remit is with regard to the plan? As it might be in place before the commission itself, will the commission be able to influence what is in it?

I accept that the Scottish Government wants to take a precautionary approach, but it is not taking enough cognisance of the fact that creelers and divers cause less damage. I will support the motion to annul on the understanding that I look to the Government to bring back another instrument as soon as possible to protect the spawning areas. There is bycatch in creels, but it is not killed—it is simply let away. Bycatch in creels is not an issue here at all. I ask the Government to look at the issue again and to come back with something sensible.

I am sorry—I did not mean that those cod spawn. Does the impact on cod stocks mean that they are not getting to adulthood?