The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 521 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
Rhoda Grant
Certainly, the new Agriculture and Rural Communities (Scotland) Act 2024 looks at “sustainable and regenerative” farming as part of what subsidies will be based on. Information will come out on that.
I wonder whether the environmental leases are geared more towards things such as carbon offsetting. Is that their purpose? If so, will they bind the landowner and subsequent tenants to carry out such things? People sequestrate carbon in order to offset carbon generation elsewhere, and I wonder whether the environmental leases could create an issue whereby somebody has bought 100 years’ worth of forestry on land, for example, to offset their carbon elsewhere. Could those leases be abused in order to do that?
Everyone is looking at me in a very puzzled way.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 10 December 2024
Rhoda Grant
Thank you, convener. I have a supplementary and a substantive question, if that is okay.
A lot of this morning’s discussion has been about land management plans and how they relate to crofting. In a way, a landowner cannot impose on the crofter what the crofter does with their tenancy, and it seems to me that that could be a conflict in land management plans. A crofting landowner might be able to write up a land management plan for only quite a small part of the land that they own, because the rest of it will be out to tenancy. Would any of that impose on a crofter’s agency, or would their rights be protected under the bill? I am concerned that land management plans might interfere with a crofter’s rights.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 10 December 2024
Rhoda Grant
Moving on to my substantive question, I note that, although previous legislation has given crofting communities a right to buy, we have not really seen that right exercised. Crofting estates have changed hands, but seldom under the crofting community right to buy. I wonder why that is. Is it an issue with the legislation itself, and could the bill provide an answer to that?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 10 December 2024
Rhoda Grant
So, if the process were simplified, it might be more useful.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 10 December 2024
Rhoda Grant
Would that not have been an option for the crofting communities on Berneray? It does not appear to have been used, but is that just because it is complex?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 10 December 2024
Rhoda Grant
So we do not need to use this act to change that in any way.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 10 December 2024
Rhoda Grant
But the crofting community right to buy does not need to wait for the estate to be up for sale, does it?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 10 December 2024
Rhoda Grant
Does anyone else have anything to add?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 3 December 2024
Rhoda Grant
My questions will go back over some issues and address one other thing that is more substantive.
You all talked about urban land reform and the way that that could be incorporated in the bill by categorising land as being of community significance. Does that need to go in the bill separately, or could the categorisation be used for rural land as well?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 3 December 2024
Rhoda Grant
I have a very brief question—and it will probably get brief answers. We talked about land management plans and how communities engage with them. How do we empower communities to engage? We have heard about the costs for landowners but how can the many individuals who live in communities on that land engage properly, given that they will be beholden to the landowner at some point?