Seòmar agus comataidhean

Skills passports will not necessarily address the technology issues for companies. That needs to be considered.

We have heard about the need for billions of pounds of investment to realise our net zero goals. How fundamental is the carbon capture, utilisation and storage Acorn cluster for the just transition not only for the north-east but for Grangemouth? There is £1 million from Ineos sitting on the table ready to move for the industrial cluster with the biggest emissions in Scotland. What is your view on that?

I refer the minister to the report that the Scottish Parliament’s Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee produced last year on carbon capture, utilisation and storage. It had all-party support and it perhaps sets out the case in a stronger way than we have time to do today.

I will move on to the wider hydrogen economy. Clearly, Scotland and the UK have significant ambitions in that regard. We have heard that, to advance on the broader hydrogen economy, we will need further work on developing credible business cases to help to draw in the private investment that you talked about and to bring to market the various technologies that we require.

What is your view on that? What can be done and what is the UK doing to support the technology for hydrogen to reach maturity and attract the significant investment that is needed? There is an element of risk, so I suppose the question is: what is the UK prepared to do to help to move that market on?

I want to move on to planning, which is quite clearly the responsibility of the Scottish Government. The national planning framework 4 has been warmly welcomed by the renewables sector but, beyond that, what work is the Scottish Government doing to aid the deployment of strategic developments? We constantly hear that there is frustration about the length of time that consenting takes. How can the consenting regime in Scotland be improved? What are you doing to make sure that that happens?

Can I ask you to focus on my question, which was about a Scottish supply chain? Inward investment is certainly very welcome—and I welcome the announcement that you have just made about the Japanese company—but are you suggesting that the only opportunities for Scottish industry will be in servicing the chain, not in manufacturing?

A strength of our targets—this is also a challenge—is the fact that they were set by the Government following a cross-party commitment. The Government was pushed to set tougher targets and to set annual targets. As you translate the revised targets into the delivery plan for the climate change plan that will be laid, as you said, at the end of November, how will you keep cross-party support, which was important in setting the ambitious targets in the first place? You said that the 2030 and 2045 targets are being kept, even if the trajectory is changing somewhat.

If you had those powers, what would you do with them?

So, smoother means quicker.

Okay. You made a point about the need for strategic infrastructure. Developers want to see faster construction and commissioning of infrastructure and approvals, whereas others want to see greater care and consideration being taken with new transmission lines, perhaps with more undergrounding, as Denmark has.

Do you see the Scottish Government’s role as being just to streamline and speed up consenting? Will you expand on the point, which I think you alluded to, that there needs to be engagement with communities so that we take them with us on this journey? Are communities really aware of the sheer scale of what will be required to maximise our electricity infrastructure to reap the benefits of both onshore and offshore wind?

Thank you.

And speed of decisions?