Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 4 December 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 491 contributions

|

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 26 November 2025

Tim Eagle

But which stakeholder is it? My understanding is that most stakeholders originally thought that there would be a much greater list of options.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 26 November 2025

Tim Eagle

We have been talking about this for years, minister, and there are four options a few months before we are going to put this into place.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 26 November 2025

Tim Eagle

If we were to vote against it today, that could be a problem.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 26 November 2025

Tim Eagle

I have a few more questions, minister. I have a fundamental concern. The Government has been talking about this with stakeholders for years and I still feel that it is a bit of smoke and mirrors. We are going around in circles and not getting the options out there. My understanding is that the original ambition was for there to be a whole new tier 2—not enhanced greening as it is now. Is it still your ambition to deliver that? If so, on what timeline?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 26 November 2025

Tim Eagle

The Scottish National Party Government has this sort of rule whereby you follow the European Union legislation that comes into place. Is that holding us back with regard to how we will move forward with our agricultural policy?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 26 November 2025

Tim Eagle

But we are keeping in step with the EU at every turn, are we not?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 26 November 2025

Tim Eagle

It has, because the Scottish Government has a policy of following EU rules and legislation.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 26 November 2025

Tim Eagle

I suspect, minister, that your answer to this will be yes, but I want to express the seriousness of the issue. It is about monitoring the impact of the scheme, particularly on those small producers that may be just over the 10-cow limit. I expect that you will monitor the impact, but, in all seriousness, once the policy leaves the committee and Parliament, you are charged with full responsibility for it. Can we get a guarantee that you will monitor it carefully and that, if problems come up—as Beatrice Wishart just suggested—you will bring it back to Parliament or give us an update via letter or something, to say what could be done to change it in the future?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 26 November 2025

Tim Eagle

First, I will talk about Mark Ruskell’s amendments. He lodged them very quickly, but they exactly represent the concerns about part 2 of the bill that we heard. It is not often that we hear such uniform concern from various stakeholders, but it is what was apparent.

I like what Mark Ruskell has done. My personal preference—I urge any Opposition member in the committee to consider this—is that we should say at stage 2, “Delete this, go back and think again.” The cabinet secretary and the civil servants behind the scenes should go back, because there is clearly a problem here. Various amendments are floating around, some of which I agree with and some of which I do not. Fundamentally, Mark Ruskell is right to push to delete part 2 of the bill at stage 2. Rather than amending part 2 in a piecemeal way, let us have a proper debate on its provisions once the Government has taken more advice from stakeholders ahead of stage 3.

My amendment 313 is effectively a non-regression clause that would retain the protections that are currently in place, should we choose not to delete part 2 today. However, as I said, my preference is that we delete part 2 at this point, so I fully support Mark Ruskell’s amendments 1, 2 and 3.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 26 November 2025

Tim Eagle

Is it not quite crude to look at farms in that way? Not only do we have enhanced greening under tier 2, but many farms are also in the Scottish rural development programme, the agri-environment climate scheme and so on, and some farms are organic. Every farm will be doing its own environmental work, and I think that many farmers, crofters and smallholders are doing a lot of good environmental work out there.

This goes back to my earlier frustration. If there had been an expanded options list under tier 2, farmers might have been able to pick exactly what worked on their farm, to the benefit of the nature on that farm, rather than having a smaller group of options, which might restrict them.

When it comes to farm viability, I have two questions. First, are you looking to go above the 7 per cent figure at any point in the future? Secondly, do you foresee introducing more and different options before the 7 per cent requirement comes into effect in 2027?