The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 430 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Tim Eagle
How would you ensure that, following the merger, parties would have rights of appeal that were equivalent to those that they have now?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Tim Eagle
And that is despite the fact that the original discussions were all about Thornton track, which was an oval track at the time.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Tim Eagle
Okay.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Tim Eagle
I do not know whether this is a fair question, but people will be watching this, and we have mentioned the other bills. For absolute clarity, I am conscious that amendments have been lodged to Maurice Golden’s bill that will open up its scope to include working dogs and so on. We are talking about greyhounds here, but dogs are used in a multitude of different disciplines in Scotland. At present, the Government is not looking at doing anything else with sheepdogs, working dogs, retrieval dogs for field sports or anything like that. Is this bill, including at stage 2, for you purely about greyhounds in Scotland?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Tim Eagle
Good morning. Can you talk us through the consultation, evidence gathering and engagement that the Scottish Government has undertaken over the past several years to develop its current position on the bill? Can you take into account Thornton racetrack’s concern that the only people who replied to the consultation on the bill were animal activists? How has the Government tried to make that all as broad as possible?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Tim Eagle
Okay. So, in your mind, Thornton racetrack’s concern that the only people who had replied were animal activists is not fair, because you think that a broad range of people have responded.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Tim Eagle
I want to pick up on that point. Does that mean that you do not see any potential in licensing for an oval track instead of an outright ban? I think that the matter came before the committee in May 2024, which was prior to my time on the committee, but it is my understanding that, when we considered the petition, it was reported that there was no need for a ban, and your initial position was that there was no need for a ban. You do not see that there is a potential benefit here—that, rather than going down this route, we could use licensing both for an oval track and for any future straight track.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Tim Eagle
Okay, but I just want to confirm this, and it goes back to the convener’s earlier question. The change in the Government’s position from 2024 to 2025 concerned only the change from implementing an outright ban to banning racing only on oval tracks.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Tim Eagle
Rhoda Grant makes a fair point. Do you think that there is a responsibility on the Government here? Governments are held to higher account. Is there a responsibility on the Government, noting that multiple members’ bills are being introduced that are all pooling the same thought? Does the Government need to step in and, rather than accept and back those various bills, look at the bigger picture more holistically?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Tim Eagle
Could you twist your mic up slightly in case people cannot hear you?
To clarify, are you satisfied that you have reached as wide a group of people as you can with the consultation that has been done, either by the Government or by the member in charge of the bill? Going back to the convener’s point about the change in the Government’s position as the bill has developed, are you satisfied that consultation pre and post that change has brought in all the evidence that we need to see?