Skip to main content

Language: English / Gàidhlig

Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 3 April 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 225 contributions

|

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 5 March 2025

Tim Eagle

In the 1996 act, the term is just “competent”, but in the bill it is “fit and competent”. What does the addition of “fit” mean? I presume that you do not want to decrease the number of stalkers that we have in Scotland, because we need them to carry on. Are you considering things such as grandfather rights for those people who are clearly able and have been doing that work for a long time?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 5 March 2025

Tim Eagle

The argument is that the landscape is quite crowded and complex. Would it have been better to rethink all of that? Could that have been done in the bill to make things easier?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 5 March 2025

Tim Eagle

I am talking about the proposed new section 1(2).

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

“Economic, Social and Cultural Rights in the Highlands and Islands”

Meeting date: 26 February 2025

Tim Eagle

I think that my question has just been answered. I was going to ask what response you have had from the Scottish Government and what your big summary message to us is. You have just said that it is not just the Scottish Government but all of us as MSPs, in representing our constituents, who have a responsibility to be pushing and questioning and constantly asking. Unless there is anything else that you want to add, I think that you just summarised the situation.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

“Economic, Social and Cultural Rights in the Highlands and Islands”

Meeting date: 26 February 2025

Tim Eagle

It is an interesting point that we hide smaller groups because of a bigger subset. Perhaps I made the wrong assumption, but I thought that we would factor that into such research. However, your evidence is that we do not. Your research allowed smaller groups to have a voice, which otherwise they might not have had. It might not even be in Inverness. Elgin or Dingwall, for example, have slightly larger populations that are significantly bigger than west coast villages with a handful of people.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

“Economic, Social and Cultural Rights in the Highlands and Islands”

Meeting date: 26 February 2025

Tim Eagle

Good morning. It has been a really interesting discussion. I have to admit that I have just been looking up your briefing papers on human rights budgeting to try to get it into my head. I might take you up on the offer to meet you separately to go through some of that, because I am struggling a wee bit to understand how human rights come into the national performance framework and national outcomes and then into delivery within the financial envelope that we have. I hope that, one day, I will get my head around it.

My question is about the Scottish household survey. Interestingly, there was broad satisfaction across Scotland, in rural and urban areas, with services such as schools and health, although the satisfaction rates for public transport in rural areas were suggested to be worse.

How did you factor other surveys, such as the Scottish household survey, into your research? Do you have any comments on the comparison between your work and the household survey?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Future Agriculture Policy

Meeting date: 19 February 2025

Tim Eagle

That is because it is messy.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Future Agriculture Policy

Meeting date: 19 February 2025

Tim Eagle

I have a quick question on the cost of that work. Minister, what do you estimate the potential cost of any changes to the IT system will be? For clarity, is that money already in the budget? Do you know where the money would come from for any changes?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Future Agriculture Policy

Meeting date: 19 February 2025

Tim Eagle

I do not dispute that that is the overall aim and, potentially, one of the benefits of technology, but history tells us that these things can cost a huge amount of money. I am looking for a commitment that that will not be taken out of the existing agricultural budgets and that, if money is needed for technology, it will be provided separately—or that that will be a separate budget discussion.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Future Agriculture Policy

Meeting date: 19 February 2025

Tim Eagle

I want to pick up on a couple of points about the code. You say that there has been feedback from all those people. Is that feedback publicly available, or is it feedback that comes to you but that we cannot see, read or hear about?