The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 225 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Tim Eagle
If you are not going to implement legislative changes on the 30 by 30 targets, how will you make progress on them?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Tim Eagle
I will come to the point on “have regard to” in a second, because I love a bit of legal terminology.
First, I go back to Emma Harper’s point about economic opportunities in national parks, which is critical. I want to double check that I have this right. Section 1 of the 2000 act sets out four principal national park aims and, in the bill, you slightly tinker with those aims but not very much. However, section 5(2)(1) of the bill amends the 2000 act by introducing a new section 1(2), which adds six new aims that are around issues such as the natural environment, biodiversity, climate and access. Those aims expand upon the four main national park aims, but none of them refers to the economy or economic development in a national park.
That concerns me slightly, because lots of businesses, not just farmers, operate in the parks. Why not add another aim that is about enhancing and protecting the sustainable economic development of those areas?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Tim Eagle
I want to try to get a little more clarity on the deer management plans and how they will operate. Out of curiosity, do you see them as, in effect, the same as the deer management nature restoration orders? How are they different, if that makes sense?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Tim Eagle
That is the question that I am asking. There might be a plan in place, but, at some point, NatureScot might decide that the plan is not delivering what it wants. At that point, can there be a period of discussion before any further process is needed? NatureScot might come back at that point and say, “We still disagree with you,” but is there a process by which the landowner can provide evidence to NatureScot?
I am asking, in effect, whether there is an appeals process. Does the landowner have the power to disagree, or do they just have to do what NatureScot says?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Tim Eagle
Do you have any thoughts at this point on what that would be?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Tim Eagle
Okay—fine. Thank you.
I will go back to the point that Norman Munro made a minute ago about the statutory duty being changed from “have regard to” to “facilitate the implementation of”. What will that mean in practice for a local authority or other public body in a national park area?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Tim Eagle
What is the thinking behind that? Let us say that I am a councillor sitting on one of our wonderful councils and a national park covers part of my ward, and I am struggling for cash. Currently, when I get a paper that covers part of the national park area, I would have regard to the plan—I think that I understand what it is trying to do and that I have to go in a certain direction. However, under the bill, I will have to facilitate the implementation of that plan. That might have an economic or financial consequence, or it might have a consequence for what I can do on planning, education or anything else. Will you develop that a little more and say what you expect the local government lawyers to say to that?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Tim Eagle
Okay. I think that I understand. Thank you.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Tim Eagle
In your mind, then, this is just the addition of a word, and it does not make any real difference to NatureScot. One could argue whether it is required at all.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Tim Eagle
What is the primary motivation for changing the authorisation system for taking or killing deer during the close season or at night or by using vehicles? How will it help with deer management in Scotland, which is one of the fundamental aims of this section of the bill?