The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 225 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Tim Eagle
Perhaps I am wrong about this, but my understanding is that NatureScot has a range of things it can look at when considering deer management, but the word “environment” has now been put in. What does that mean to a land manager? If NatureScot can come and say that you must have regard to the environment before you put in place a deer management plan or it can force you to do X, Y and Z, what does that look like to a land manager on the ground? That is my understanding, at least. The word “environment” is a new addition, is it not?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Tim Eagle
You do not foresee the process being used very much.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Tim Eagle
What is the process? It is quite subjective, is it not, around the nature restoration stuff? If NatureScot says that it is not happy, so it wants a plan, will there be a move straight to a plan or can there be a period of discussion before a plan needs to be made? Can NatureScot say, “If you do this, we probably won’t need to go to that extent,” or does there have to be a jump straight to a plan? What happens if the landowner says, “Actually, I think that we are doing everything”? What evidence could they supply to NatureScot in saying, “We disagree with you here—we think that we are abiding by what you require of us”?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Tim Eagle
The overarching aims also include conserving and enhancing an area’s “natural and cultural heritage” and promoting “sustainable use” and management of natural areas, and those are also among the six new aims that are set out in section 1(2). However, economic development is not specifically referred to.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Tim Eagle
Perhaps I am missing the point and you felt that some of the aims needed to be expanded on. I look at the six new aims and think that they are already inbuilt in the original four. However, as we take evidence from various bodies, it will be interesting to know whether they look at the aims and think, “We don’t need to talk more about this, because it is there and clear.” We will find that out as we go forward.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Tim Eagle
That is fine—it is not in the bill. I was curious as to whether that had gone through your minds in the process of developing the bill, but we can discuss that as we take more evidence. What is the purpose of putting in “fit”, though?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Tim Eagle
That is good to hear. I asked about that just for clarity, because we are already getting questions about it. I assumed that what you have mentioned will apply, but it is good to have that on the record so that we know what we are looking at.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Tim Eagle
The bill sees the addition of the word “environment” to things that NatureScot must account for. What criteria or metrics will be used to assess environmental impact, and how will it be balanced by local management?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Tim Eagle
The bill sees the addition of the word “environment” to the things that NatureScot must account for. What was the purpose of that addition and how will you assess that? What does it mean in practice?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Tim Eagle
Good morning. Thank you for coming in.
My questions are about the 30 by 30 targets for 30 per cent of land and sea to be protected by 2030. I believe that the legislative team thought about making changes to legislation to help to make that doable in the foreseeable future, but there is nothing in the bill on that. What did you think it might have been useful to include in the legislation, and why are those things not in the bill? How do you think that you can make progress on the 30 by 30 targets?