The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 225 contributions
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2024
Tim Eagle
I have a question about the potential for a complaints procedure to be set out in the legislation. The issue was raised in our discussion with the first panel, so Morna Grandison has already given an answer. Some submissions said that, in the event that something were to go wrong, the first recourse should be to the Accountant of Court, which might be a good idea if a complaints procedure were available thereafter. Do you have thoughts on that?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2024
Tim Eagle
I am content with them, but I am interested in the fees and how they have been set, and whether that could provide a barrier to export. Although that is not in the jurisdiction of the committee, could we write to the lead committee to highlight that as a potential concern, or is that not within our remit?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2024
Tim Eagle
Good morning. I have a question for the Law Society about the procedures for the appointment of judicial factors in cases of missing people. The Law Society’s submission to the committee sets out that it is disappointed that reforms are not being taken forward in that area, as it initially raised the issue in 2019, and that
“the current procedure is too cumbersome, prescriptive and restrictive.”
In his evidence last week, Mr Patrick Layden of the Scottish Law Commission proposed that improvements could be made through the way that the act is advertised, the guidance that is given to citizens advice bureaux and court procedure. Would the things that he suggested achieve the reforms that you seek?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2024
Tim Eagle
I have a quick question about qualification requirements. As the bill stands, a judicial factor basically just has to be a suitable person, as the court decides. There were a couple of comments, including from Propertymark, to say that individuals should have a specific qualification when dealing with properties. Is it fair enough for a judicial factor simply to be a suitable person? Given some of the information that we heard this morning about the broadness of a judicial factor’s work, that is probably useful, but I would appreciate your comments on whether the law should be more explicit.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2024
Tim Eagle
In terms of your work, where you have had an investigatory role as well as the judicial factor role, have you come across cases in which there are complaints? Does that happen often? Do you get to the point at which things break down to such an extent that complaints come in, or is that such a rarity that it is not really a concern?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2024
Tim Eagle
My apologies. I am relatively new to the committee, so I am trying to get my head around all this. Am I picking you up right—your suggestion is that judicial factors should not be in that register, because it is already quite specific, and that there potentially should be a new register where you can register a judicial factor—or is that not what you are saying? Are you saying that the compromise is that judicial factors can be in that register, but that it will make it much wider in its concept?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2024
Tim Eagle
Okay.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2024
Tim Eagle
Moving on, I want to ask the Charity Law Association about its concern that the bill as drafted pays “little regard” to the role of judicial factors in the charity sector. Are there specific changes that you would like to be made in the bill?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2024
Tim Eagle
I will move on to sections 34 and 38 of the bill. Section 34 of the bill deals with the discharge of the judicial factor, and section 38 deals with the accountant’s investigation powers. The centre for Scots law made a comment on the interrelationship between those sections and whether it was laid out correctly in the bill. The commission came back and explained that section 38 could apply first, before section 34, but I am bit confused by that, because it did not quite explain how it would work the opposite way round—for example, if a factor was discharged and then something came to light. Could Alisdair MacPherson, or anybody else on the panel, shed light on the interrelationship between those sections?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2024
Tim Eagle
I have one question for Professor Morgan about charities. Are you content—and, indeed, are we as the committee content—that we have, through your submission and what you have said today, your wish list? Have you put to us everything that you would like to see for the charity sector in this bill, or do you want to write to us to detail exactly what you would like to see, based on some of your comments today?