The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 225 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 January 2025
Tim Eagle
I am an MSP for the Highlands and Islands.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 20 November 2024
Tim Eagle
I think that I know where you are coming from on that. You are trying to make it as efficient as possible to meet the target. The question is how it works in practice in the industry.
Is there a risk of misrecording? Could farmers start registering calves that then die so that they can get within the 410 days? Is that likely?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 20 November 2024
Tim Eagle
Okay, that is fine—it is possible to do that.
With autumn calving, slips are much more likely in percentage terms. At that time, it is much less likely that the calving interval that you propose will be met. That is a worry, is it not, because we want distribution of stock coming to market across the year. Have you taken any evidence, or do you have any concerns about, the risks of calving at certain points in the year? An SRUC study suggested that 63 to 65 per cent of late autumn calves would meet the 410-day threshold, which means that around 40 per cent of late autumn calvers might not meet that condition.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 20 November 2024
Tim Eagle
I asked you that question because we do not yet have the rural support plan. We have the agenda that the Government would like to go on, but we do not yet have the detail. We, and our farmers in particular, are questioning what is coming. They are wondering, “What avenue do I take? How do I take that? If I go down this route now as I plan for my business, what will the scheme come out with?” That is what I am worried about. Coupled support is important in parts of Scotland and, to be fair, probably all of Scotland. I am curious to see what your thoughts are on it.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 20 November 2024
Tim Eagle
Thank you, convener—was I coming in at this point?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 20 November 2024
Tim Eagle
Peatland.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 20 November 2024
Tim Eagle
Do you mean the first question that I asked?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 20 November 2024
Tim Eagle
I will throw in one more thing. I think that you said that you will look to the future and monitor the scheme, and I guess that you would want to, because I presume that we would all want to see our island and crofting communities, as well as our traditional agricultural communities, thrive. You spoke about the calf payment going up. Is the money for the Scottish suckler beef support scheme ring fenced?
09:30Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 20 November 2024
Tim Eagle
On the future of voluntary coupled support, am I correct that that will run up to 2028?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 20 November 2024
Tim Eagle
Yes. I just wanted to check that the cow could come back in. If someone had a pedigree cow with great genetics, they could keep that on and, ultimately, it would get the payment again.
Rhoda Grant’s point is significant. We have full-time farmers who can drive efficiency and change. We see that a lot in our industry. As we saw in London yesterday, farmers are really trying to push forward and want to work with Governments. However, we also have lifestyle farming. We see that on the west coast, on the islands and in our crofting communities, where the farmer often works away on other jobs.
The SRUC evidence suggests that the calving intervals are less likely to be met in some of our more crofting communities. We do not want to risk further pushing away the herd in those areas. The statistics suggest that the herd is going down quicker on our island communities.
What thought have you given to that, minister? If we were to approve the regulations and we were to see significantly less issue on the islands, would you be prepared to come back and say that we might need to tailor a specific scheme to help our islands and crofters?