Skip to main content

Language: English / Gàidhlig

Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 4 April 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 225 contributions

|

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Inshore Fisheries Management Improvement Programme

Meeting date: 5 February 2025

Tim Eagle

Good morning, everybody. I understand that you have been doing a desktop review of other models of inshore fisheries management from around the world. It would be interesting to know what you have found out from it initially, and what key findings you have picked up.

The inshore fisheries and conservation authorities—IFCAs—in England have come up in conversation with constituents, along with their perceived benefits due to their statutory footing. Will you touch on what you have learned from your desktop review about IFCAs and what you think about them?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Inshore Fisheries Management Improvement Programme

Meeting date: 5 February 2025

Tim Eagle

Was that conference in Glasgow?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Inshore Fisheries Management Improvement Programme

Meeting date: 5 February 2025

Tim Eagle

I want to clarify something. I am quite interested in national and/or localised management and what you might have learned from your desktop study about what the better approach is. I was slightly worried by what you said about the IFCAs, although I might have picked you up wrong. The scope of your review or what we are talking about surely should not be constrained by the resource allocation to the marine directorate as a whole, because what we want is the best approach. If more money is required for a different approach, we as a committee and as a Parliament can debate that later on with the cabinet secretary. If IFCAs were the perfect model for Scotland, we should use that model, even if it means that the marine directorate needs more money. Does that make sense?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Inshore Fisheries Management Improvement Programme

Meeting date: 5 February 2025

Tim Eagle

My question has been covered.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Deer Working Group Report

Meeting date: 29 January 2025

Tim Eagle

Good morning, everyone. This is a broad question about the recommendations in the deer working group report, the Scottish Government’s response and the timeline for implementation, and I would also like to hear your thoughts on deer management nature restoration orders. That should take up another couple of hours. [Laughter.]

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Deer Working Group Report

Meeting date: 29 January 2025

Tim Eagle

Tom has just beaten me to my question, which was about the deer management strategic board. When the board was mentioned, Tom and Duncan Orr-Ewing turned and smiled at each other. I know that Donald Fraser sits on the board—it is only representatives of Government agencies who sit on it. For clarity on Tom’s point, how effective is the flow of information from the practitioner level to discussions at the strategic level?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Deer Working Group Report

Meeting date: 29 January 2025

Tim Eagle

I am an MSP for the Highlands and Islands region.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 22 January 2025

Tim Eagle

I guess that the problem with data is that you can constantly keep collecting it and not doing things. Of the recommendations in the salmon interactions working group report, which is on interactions between wild and farmed salmon, I think that only one has been completed. Dr Middlemas talked about a period of two years, which is quite a long time. Is there any way of speeding things up? We want the species to recover and we want better management of it. My worry is that we will delay and delay while we get more and more data and that we will not actually push forward.

09:45  

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 22 January 2025

Tim Eagle

Maybe I picked you up wrongly.

We have had some interaction with people who are not sure how the information that they feed back to you guys is being utilised when it comes to the regulations. The talk of fish counters sounds promising, but we probably need to roll out more of them. Ultimately, all of this has to feed into the protection of the species so that we see more fish. How do we do that? How do we get that done on the ground?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 22 January 2025

Tim Eagle

My slight problem is that, although I agree with Elena Whitham that there is a danger if we annul, I, like Rhoda Grant, do not like to be put in a position where I feel that things are being compromised. That worries me. I am hearing that the people on the ground are saying that they have submitted data but Marine Scotland is saying that it has not received that data. That feels odd. What is going on? I go back to my earlier question about the promise. You are probably right, cabinet secretary, that you do not have time to bring the instrument back, but, if I do not vote to annul it today, what guarantee is there that we will not be in the same situation next year?