The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 225 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Tim Eagle
Good morning, everybody. I understand that you have been doing a desktop review of other models of inshore fisheries management from around the world. It would be interesting to know what you have found out from it initially, and what key findings you have picked up.
The inshore fisheries and conservation authorities—IFCAs—in England have come up in conversation with constituents, along with their perceived benefits due to their statutory footing. Will you touch on what you have learned from your desktop review about IFCAs and what you think about them?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Tim Eagle
Was that conference in Glasgow?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Tim Eagle
I want to clarify something. I am quite interested in national and/or localised management and what you might have learned from your desktop study about what the better approach is. I was slightly worried by what you said about the IFCAs, although I might have picked you up wrong. The scope of your review or what we are talking about surely should not be constrained by the resource allocation to the marine directorate as a whole, because what we want is the best approach. If more money is required for a different approach, we as a committee and as a Parliament can debate that later on with the cabinet secretary. If IFCAs were the perfect model for Scotland, we should use that model, even if it means that the marine directorate needs more money. Does that make sense?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Tim Eagle
My question has been covered.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Tim Eagle
Good morning, everyone. This is a broad question about the recommendations in the deer working group report, the Scottish Government’s response and the timeline for implementation, and I would also like to hear your thoughts on deer management nature restoration orders. That should take up another couple of hours. [Laughter.]
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Tim Eagle
Tom has just beaten me to my question, which was about the deer management strategic board. When the board was mentioned, Tom and Duncan Orr-Ewing turned and smiled at each other. I know that Donald Fraser sits on the board—it is only representatives of Government agencies who sit on it. For clarity on Tom’s point, how effective is the flow of information from the practitioner level to discussions at the strategic level?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Tim Eagle
I am an MSP for the Highlands and Islands region.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Tim Eagle
I guess that the problem with data is that you can constantly keep collecting it and not doing things. Of the recommendations in the salmon interactions working group report, which is on interactions between wild and farmed salmon, I think that only one has been completed. Dr Middlemas talked about a period of two years, which is quite a long time. Is there any way of speeding things up? We want the species to recover and we want better management of it. My worry is that we will delay and delay while we get more and more data and that we will not actually push forward.
09:45Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Tim Eagle
Maybe I picked you up wrongly.
We have had some interaction with people who are not sure how the information that they feed back to you guys is being utilised when it comes to the regulations. The talk of fish counters sounds promising, but we probably need to roll out more of them. Ultimately, all of this has to feed into the protection of the species so that we see more fish. How do we do that? How do we get that done on the ground?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Tim Eagle
My slight problem is that, although I agree with Elena Whitham that there is a danger if we annul, I, like Rhoda Grant, do not like to be put in a position where I feel that things are being compromised. That worries me. I am hearing that the people on the ground are saying that they have submitted data but Marine Scotland is saying that it has not received that data. That feels odd. What is going on? I go back to my earlier question about the promise. You are probably right, cabinet secretary, that you do not have time to bring the instrument back, but, if I do not vote to annul it today, what guarantee is there that we will not be in the same situation next year?