The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 302 contributions
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 14 January 2025
Roz McCall
Absolutely. Thank you. Kay, do you have anything to add?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 14 January 2025
Roz McCall
Does anyone else want to come in on that?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 14 January 2025
Roz McCall
That is very helpful, thank you. My next question is on Henry VIII powers. Are they appropriate or inappropriate?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 14 January 2025
Roz McCall
That is helpful.
I will go to Vicky Crichton, and then to Kay Springham. With regard to the idea of improving scrutiny and accountability in relation to secondary legislation, should we be looking at any safeguards or controls?
11:30Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 7 January 2025
Roz McCall
Good morning—it is still morning. There is much that I want to pick up on, so bear with me.
You have highlighted the drafting process. Thank you, Diggory, for doing that. I am picking up from you that it is not drafters who come up with whether something will be framework legislation or whether policy will be enacted through primary legislation. Drafting is just about the morphosis of an idea as it starts to go through.
I asked this question before. Is there, in effect, a line? As you go through the process, do you say, “This has been the conceptual idea, this is what we are trying to do, and this is what the minister is trying to get to. We are building up the bill and moving it forward, and now we’re drafting it. Now it has crossed the line that we have moved it towards. It will stay in framework or skeleton form”, or do you say “We now can see that there is a definite line and we can move this forward”? Is there a process like that?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 7 January 2025
Roz McCall
Absolutely.
Jessica highlighted earlier that
“producing good legislation takes time”,
which I thought was very interesting. I infer from that that, if there is a speedy expedited process, the chances are that you are moving towards writing what is not necessarily bad legislation, but is certainly not good legislation. Then, there is the genie out of the bottle that is 24-hour news, and the desire of elected officials to expedite the process as much as possible so that they are seen to be doing something. When you are writing legislation, do you feel that there is a possibility that we are moving on a continual conveyor belt of producing what is not necessarily good legislation?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 7 January 2025
Roz McCall
The joy of going last is that either you are saying what everybody else has already said or nobody wants to hear what you have got to say. I thank the witnesses for all their input. It was very interesting and informative. As others said, we know what the problems are; finding solutions will be harder.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 7 January 2025
Roz McCall
That was very helpful.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 7 January 2025
Roz McCall
I will just say happy new year and get that out of the way. Thank you very much for attending today.
I want to follow up what has been a really interesting line of questioning. I am sorry, Professor Whitaker, but I am going to come back to you—I know that you have been doing a lot of talking. In your initial comments, you talked about the difficulty of knowing when this sort of thing crosses the line. Is that basically because there is no line? Do we have this problem because we do not know when a line is crossed? If so, should there be a threshold? Should we state, “No, this is when we have a framework or skeleton bill”—whatever you want to call it—“and this is where we need primary legislation”? Would it be sensible to create a threshold?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 7 January 2025
Roz McCall
Does anyone else want to come in?