The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 298 contributions
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 30 March 2023
Roz McCall
You said that you have three new members of staff, which is excellent. I am glad to hear that. However, we heard anecdotally that there would be a staff increase of up to 7.4 full-time equivalents, so you have been running on half. Is there a move to increase your staff by 7.4 full-time equivalents? Are you still recruiting? Also, is it the three new staff who will take until approximately this time next year to be fully up and running? Will you give a little more information on that?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 30 March 2023
Roz McCall
I feel comfortable knowing that you have that information so that we could see it. That is great. Thank you for your answers.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 30 March 2023
Roz McCall
So you could not give us an indication of how long you think it would take to get such a plan in place.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 30 March 2023
Roz McCall
Thank you—that helps a lot. As far as I can see, staffing is part of the medium-term planning. The report mentions some gaps in that planning, so I ask you to say a wee bit about that. The report suggests that the medium-term plan has almost reverted back on itself. There were going to be some cuts and some savings in the finances, but that has been superseded. What progress has been made towards completing the medium-term plans? Will you give us some information on your financial stability and sustainability?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 30 March 2023
Roz McCall
I will go back to something that you said, Mr Boyle, regarding transitions to adult mental health. The previous Auditor General for Scotland made comments about things that were taking place with the Royal hospital for children and young people, the department of clinical neurosciences and the child and adolescent mental health service in NHS Lothian. Can you give me any update on that?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 30 March 2023
Roz McCall
Okay. I will bring my questions back to the slides that were provided for the work programme rather than go off piste.
I notice that work on early learning and childcare is in the pipeline. Are you able to give the committee some information about the scope of that work at this early stage? Will you be looking at childcare from the view of a care-experienced child as well?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 November 2022
Roz McCall
I welcome the cabinet secretary’s remarks, for which I thank her. I accept the offer to work with her to improve the Government’s amendments at stage 3, so I will support her amendments in this group.
I seek to withdraw amendment 83.
Amendment 83, by agreement, withdrawn.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 November 2022
Roz McCall
I clarify to members of the committee that my amendments are probing ones to ascertain from the cabinet secretary her views on the principle of overseas gender certificate recognition, so I do not intend to press them. However, I hope that the cabinet secretary can provide some answers.
The amendments would do different things. One would remove the process of overseas gender recognition entirely. Essentially, that would mean that we would revert to the status quo position in which a person would have to obtain a gender recognition certificate through the process that is outlined in the bill without any bespoke overseas recognition process. That is currently the case across the United Kingdom.
Amendment 93 would, in effect, ensure that somebody moving to Scotland from overseas would not have any more or fewer rights than anybody who currently resides in Scotland. That is the important part.
The intention of the other amendments in the group is to allow “approved countries” to have the process of overseas gender recognition, whereas everyone else would have to go through the process to obtain a gender recognition certificate. That was to outline an alternative to the committee, rather than remove the overseas gender recognition provision from the bill in its entirety. However, as previously mentioned, I do not intend to press the amendments at this stage.
As the bill will introduce a new process for overseas gender recognition, it is important that we get on record the cabinet secretary’s view on the need for that provision and the safeguards that are required if it is to proceed into law. I ask the cabinet secretary what the Scottish Government’s justification is for introducing the new process of overseas recognition for gender certificates. Does she agree that the bill, as currently drafted, does not include adequate safeguards to prevent bad actors from exploiting the overseas recognition provisions as they currently stand? Is she willing to strengthen the safeguards in that part of the bill? Does she see any merit in the proposed outlines in my amendments that she could support if their technical drafting were improved?
I move amendment 83.