The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 302 contributions
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 11 January 2024
Roz McCall
That is excellent. Thank you very much indeed.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 11 January 2024
Roz McCall
Yes, I would. Bob Doris keeps doing that to me. This question follows on from the one that he asked.
I am very interested in forecast error. My question touches on what you have said. I appreciate the information that you have provided. According to the information that you have given us, we are looking at a forecast error of 3 per cent, or £127 million. As has been mentioned, as time goes on and the bill increases, a 3 per cent variance becomes a lot of money. Can we continue to expect to have a 3 per cent forecasting error? Moving forward, we really need to have a plus or minus figure in our thought processes as we look at budget forecasting.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 7 December 2023
Roz McCall
I apologise for this, cabinet secretary, but I want to go back to Mr Mason’s question about how clients will be informed. According to your initial answer, everybody signs up to the initial agreement that there will be information sharing, but the fact is that many people who are in circumstances of stress will agree to a lot of things without fully understanding what they actually mean. In cases in which there can be no explicit consent because of the circumstances that have already been highlighted, how will the individual know that all this is happening, in effect, in the background?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 7 December 2023
Roz McCall
Good morning, everyone, and thank you for coming along.
I want to talk about timing, which Mark Griffin has already alluded to reasonably succinctly in his opening statement. As you are aware, the Scottish Government wrote to the committee on 6 November and said that it will shortly consult on EIA, but we are still some years away from its delivery. The cabinet secretary could not give a lead-in time from consultation to benefit introduction, and she did not give a timescale. You have highlighted that time is running out.
On the timescale, can you elaborate a little more on why the bill should be supported in the absence of any policy on EIA or commitment to a firm timetable for its introduction and/or reform? Why not wait for the consultation?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 7 December 2023
Roz McCall
Again, please excuse my ignorance on this, but we could have a situation in which the first thing that the client knows is when somebody from social work turns up at the door.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 7 December 2023
Roz McCall
Good morning, cabinet secretary. What training and guidance are in place to ensure that data sharing is proportionate? You alluded to this in your opening statement, but can you give us a more detailed idea of what you think is proportionate?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 7 December 2023
Roz McCall
Thank you. I appreciate that.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 7 December 2023
Roz McCall
I am totally behind the understanding that underpins the change, and I think that it is important. I will always have a concern that the individual or the client may, in a lot of cases, be circumvented in certain ways. I accept whole-heartedly the attempt to move forward, and it is important that we do so, but there will always be a little question mark at the back of my mind, as the individual still needs to be at the heart of everything that we do.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 30 November 2023
Roz McCall
That was helpful—thank you. A lot of the information that you have provided today, including the article that was sent to us, has been very helpful to me, as somebody who is reasonably new to the committee and does not have that systemic memory that you have mentioned.
Another question sprung to mind when you stated earlier in the session—in response to the deputy convener, I think—that SCOSS is now in a position where it could perhaps handle an increase in responsibility in what we are looking at. Earlier, the cabinet secretary was of the mind that that was maybe not the right way to go. Can you expand on why you think this is the right place for the commission to move forward and why it provides the right avenue for taking on that additional responsibility?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 30 November 2023
Roz McCall
I am, yes.