The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 302 contributions
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 18 April 2024
Roz McCall
I am sorry, but I just want to confirm this. Given that evidence, it sounds as though that might be a legal position. Has the Government looked at that, and is it minded to make that increase?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 18 April 2024
Roz McCall
I should have said hello to the cabinet secretary on my first question, so I apologise for not welcoming her to the committee with the team.
In its written submission, the Child Poverty Action Group pointed out that the bill includes a large number of new regulation-making powers that are not added to SCOSS’s remit. It says:
“All should be subject to statutory scrutiny by SCoSS.”
Why does the Scottish Government consider that SCOSS scrutiny is not necessary specifically for compensation recovery or information for audit?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 18 April 2024
Roz McCall
I look forward to seeing those amendments. Thank you.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 28 March 2024
Roz McCall
That is very helpful. We need to have a balanced view on that issue, and your comments help with that.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 28 March 2024
Roz McCall
Thank you. That was exceptionally helpful in allowing me to understand that process. I have no further questions.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 28 March 2024
Roz McCall
I understand that.
That leads on to the adult disability payment. Why do you think that most requests for redetermination are about adult disability payments? Does it suggest anything about Social Security Scotland’s decision making for that benefit? I will go the other way round, if that is okay—you alluded to adult disability, Erica, but we will start with Richard this time.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 28 March 2024
Roz McCall
No, but it is a valid point, and I accept that. Erica, do you have anything to add to that?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 28 March 2024
Roz McCall
Thank you for helping us out by providing such in-depth answers. I am certainly not a lawyer, so I have some daft-lassie—as opposed to daft-laddie—questions.
You alluded to this on the opposing side, but I want to narrow it down a bit. Do you have any views on the necessity of the proposed provisions? What would be the implications of not enabling compensation recovery for Social Security Scotland benefits? I am not sure who is the best placed to answer that question.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 28 March 2024
Roz McCall
I welcome the witnesses back to the committee. I really appreciate your candour and honesty on these questions. It is important that the committee hears about how we get things right and where the issues are when it comes to redeterminations.
About 75 per cent of child disability payment redeterminations are decided in favour of the client. Does that raise any concerns with you about the decision-making process for that benefit? We will start with you, Erica, if you do not mind. Please be as open and honest as you can on this point.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 28 March 2024
Roz McCall
I just want to make sure that I have this right. If additional information has come forward in the cases in which there is a positive redetermination, the argument would be that we should look for that proper information up front. Is that what you are saying—that we should really look at how we front load the process to ensure that we have the information right the first time, as was alluded to earlier?