Skip to main content

Language: English / Gàidhlig

Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 3 April 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 754 contributions

|

Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]

New Deal for Business

Meeting date: 26 February 2025

Lorna Slater

You guys have had loads of time, come on.

Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]

New Deal for Business

Meeting date: 26 February 2025

Lorna Slater

That is the bit that I am interested in. I agree about the jargon of “wellbeing economy” and “net zero”. How do businesspeople look at their own businesses and employees in relation to terms such as “the circular economy”? Again, nobody knows what that means.

Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]

New Deal for Business

Meeting date: 26 February 2025

Lorna Slater

Reporting is an incentive for taking things forward.

Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]

New Deal for Business

Meeting date: 26 February 2025

Lorna Slater

I have heard that the businesses that you represent are broadly on board. They understand that part of the wellbeing economy is about paying living wages and that the circular economy means looking at what happens to their waste and making their processes more efficient. People get it, but they are struggling with having the resources and bandwidth to actually do it. Is that a reasonable summary?

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review

Meeting date: 20 February 2025

Lorna Slater

I absolutely understand the importance of the independence aspect. When we were speaking with the Ethical Standards Commissioner and the Standards Commission for Scotland, they spoke about the importance to them of separating the investigative role from the adjudication role. However, for your role, the two are combined. I am just trying to understand why it is different for them from how it is for you.

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review

Meeting date: 20 February 2025

Lorna Slater

Thank you.

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review

Meeting date: 20 February 2025

Lorna Slater

One of my follow-up questions relates to something that you alluded to earlier. With regard to the title “commissioner”, within the SPCB supported bodies there are commissioners but there are also, for example, ombudsmen, and there are roles outwith the SPCB supported bodies that have the title “commissioner”. Is the title “commissioner” useful for describing your role or all the roles that are covered by that title?

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review

Meeting date: 20 February 2025

Lorna Slater

Not at all. In this landscape review we do not just want to look at overlaps, we want to look at where there are potential gaps.

We all have biometric passports now. We can imagine a future in which payment systems are biometric or library cards have biometrics. We can imagine biometrics becoming a standard identification technique. When we imagine that landscape, we need to make sure that gaps are covered and that the system is robust, so that there is no instinct to create a new commission every time a new thing is developed. So, I appreciate your answer on that.

I have a question to help me to make sure that I have not made a mistake. Many of the other commissioners and SPCB supported bodies that we have spoken to have very public-facing roles. Am I right that your role is entirely, or nearly entirely, not public? The public do not come to you when they have a problem; your role is about supporting the police.

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review

Meeting date: 20 February 2025

Lorna Slater

Thank you.

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review

Meeting date: 20 February 2025

Lorna Slater

We have talked a lot about the complicated landscape. Your role and the role of your office is the newest but also probably the most specific and the narrowest of these bodies. Would it be right to say that that is largely as a result of changes to technology and evidence-gathering methods? As we look ahead to the future of the landscape, we can imagine that new technologies, such as AI—goodness knows what else is ahead of us—might require other bits of data protection, better good practice by police and so on. If we are imagining a robust shape for this landscape such that, in the future, other things are required, do you imagine that something like that could be incorporated within your office? Would there be other commissioners? How do we make your function—or the role that you play in the wider landscape—robust in relation to future technological advance?