The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 754 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 February 2025
Lorna Slater
You guys have had loads of time, come on.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 February 2025
Lorna Slater
That is the bit that I am interested in. I agree about the jargon of “wellbeing economy” and “net zero”. How do businesspeople look at their own businesses and employees in relation to terms such as “the circular economy”? Again, nobody knows what that means.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 February 2025
Lorna Slater
Reporting is an incentive for taking things forward.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 February 2025
Lorna Slater
I have heard that the businesses that you represent are broadly on board. They understand that part of the wellbeing economy is about paying living wages and that the circular economy means looking at what happens to their waste and making their processes more efficient. People get it, but they are struggling with having the resources and bandwidth to actually do it. Is that a reasonable summary?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 February 2025
Lorna Slater
I absolutely understand the importance of the independence aspect. When we were speaking with the Ethical Standards Commissioner and the Standards Commission for Scotland, they spoke about the importance to them of separating the investigative role from the adjudication role. However, for your role, the two are combined. I am just trying to understand why it is different for them from how it is for you.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 February 2025
Lorna Slater
Thank you.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 February 2025
Lorna Slater
One of my follow-up questions relates to something that you alluded to earlier. With regard to the title “commissioner”, within the SPCB supported bodies there are commissioners but there are also, for example, ombudsmen, and there are roles outwith the SPCB supported bodies that have the title “commissioner”. Is the title “commissioner” useful for describing your role or all the roles that are covered by that title?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 February 2025
Lorna Slater
Not at all. In this landscape review we do not just want to look at overlaps, we want to look at where there are potential gaps.
We all have biometric passports now. We can imagine a future in which payment systems are biometric or library cards have biometrics. We can imagine biometrics becoming a standard identification technique. When we imagine that landscape, we need to make sure that gaps are covered and that the system is robust, so that there is no instinct to create a new commission every time a new thing is developed. So, I appreciate your answer on that.
I have a question to help me to make sure that I have not made a mistake. Many of the other commissioners and SPCB supported bodies that we have spoken to have very public-facing roles. Am I right that your role is entirely, or nearly entirely, not public? The public do not come to you when they have a problem; your role is about supporting the police.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 February 2025
Lorna Slater
Thank you.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 February 2025
Lorna Slater
We have talked a lot about the complicated landscape. Your role and the role of your office is the newest but also probably the most specific and the narrowest of these bodies. Would it be right to say that that is largely as a result of changes to technology and evidence-gathering methods? As we look ahead to the future of the landscape, we can imagine that new technologies, such as AI—goodness knows what else is ahead of us—might require other bits of data protection, better good practice by police and so on. If we are imagining a robust shape for this landscape such that, in the future, other things are required, do you imagine that something like that could be incorporated within your office? Would there be other commissioners? How do we make your function—or the role that you play in the wider landscape—robust in relation to future technological advance?