The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 778 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 13 June 2023
Lorna Slater
Many councils do not collect glass at all. There is the ability, when we introduce the circular economy bill, to encourage councils to standardise collection so that everywhere collects glass. In aggregate, there will be more glass in the system, because there will be more, as you say, jam jars, make-up bottles and all those sorts of things that will be included in the scheme. As we improve kerbside recycling, those glass materials can be used to meet the need for glass aggregate and all the other materials that are made of recycled glass that is not as efficient at being recycled back into glass bottles. That glass is needed and is still very valuable.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 13 June 2023
Lorna Slater
We have spoken with retailers and producers in great detail. Producers—in particular, Tennent’s—were very concerned about removal of glass from the scheme because their business is can-based, so removing glass from the scheme will render Tennent’s uncompetitive and put in place a significant barrier for its business, which is what we sought to avoid by making sure that glass was included for all businesses.
There are some challenges for everybody who handles glass in the retail space. Glass is heavy and it can be a health and safety hazard if it is broken. Handling glass is therefore a challenge for the people who need to handle it, but its inclusion has significant environmental benefits and creates a fair playing field for producers, so it is important that schemes include glass.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 13 June 2023
Lorna Slater
I am proceeding to answer the member’s question. The criteria for being a scheme administrator are laid out in the regulations. Provided that a business has met those criteria, the Scottish Government does not have the power to deny it the ability to be a scheme administrator, because a scheme could have many administrators. That is not how the power for creation of scheme administrators works. It does not come with that sort of additional conditionality with regard to how an administrator operates, but I am happy to ask officials to provide more detail.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 13 June 2023
Lorna Slater
As I said in response to an earlier question, on the basis of the actions that will we have been required to take, we do not believe that there is any requirement to pay compensation.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 13 June 2023
Lorna Slater
We have significant investment in the scheme. The delays to which you refer need to be properly explained. According to the regulations that were passed in 2020, the scheme was due to go live last year, in 2022. We had the Covid pandemic and Brexit, however, which substantially changed the circumstances in which businesses were operating.
To support businesses, we provided the first year’s delay until August this year. That was the launch date towards which we were working until, from February this year, the Secretary of State for Scotland put some doubt in the public space about whether the internal market act would be used to veto and block our scheme. He managed to make good on that threat in May and vetoed and blocked our scheme from being implemented as the Scottish Parliament had passed it.
The latter delays were specifically around interference with the scheme using the internal market act. None of them had to do with any suggestion that the scheme was not progressing operationally.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 13 June 2023
Lorna Slater
It would be wonderful to have the same level of deposit across the UK. We have passed regulations that state that the level here would be 20p. However, we do not know what it might be in the rest of the UK, so I cannot comment on that.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 13 June 2023
Lorna Slater
—but we do not know what that might look like.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 13 June 2023
Lorna Slater
I am happy to get back with that detail.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 13 June 2023
Lorna Slater
The requirement would have been to remove the regulations that were laid on 17 May. The changes to the scheme to move it to October were announced last week. We would have had to withdraw those regulations, change them and bring them back. That would have been done through an expedited process, which would allow less scrutiny and, would, potentially, run up against that recess break. I agree that doing it this way is frustrating to all of us, but it means that the committee has had the normal amount of time to scrutinise those amendments and we avoid the cliff-edge problem of what happens over the summer. It is absolutely my intention to lay—as the convener suggests—amending regulations for October 2025 before recess, but those cannot be laid until this SSI has passed.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 13 June 2023
Lorna Slater
We could have withdrawn the SSI and modified it, but the timeline for scrutiny would have been very much compressed and we felt that it was important for the committee to be able to scrutinise the regulations.