Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 14 July 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 867 contributions

|

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review

Meeting date: 20 February 2025

Lorna Slater

In my final question, I will take a slightly different approach. Some other witnesses, to whom the committee spoke about ethical standards and ombudsmen, talked about the fact that, because they interact with the broader public, it is not always clear to a member of the public who has a frustration—whether it relates to their GP, the Parliament or a member of their local council—whom to go to. Those witnesses talked about creating a one-stop shop—a website or portal, for example—where a person could enter their problem, then, behind the scenes, the one-stop shop would direct them to the public trust body that would most likely be able to help them. Could your office participate in something like that? Would that help the public who use your services or would that not be relevant to you?

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review

Meeting date: 20 February 2025

Lorna Slater

I am interested in following up on something that you said. I completely understand your cautioning us against lumping together all the SPCB supported bodies. One way to look at the landscape is that some have a public trust role and others primarily have an advocacy role. Clearly, the role of the Scottish Information Commissioner, along with the role of the ombudsman, is really important for public trust. Some of the other witnesses that we have heard from talked about the importance for their role of the separation between an investigative role and an adjudication role. It sounds as though you do both investigation and adjudication. Will you outline those aspects and why they are particularly important to your role?

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review

Meeting date: 20 February 2025

Lorna Slater

Thank you.

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review

Meeting date: 20 February 2025

Lorna Slater

One of my follow-up questions relates to something that you alluded to earlier. With regard to the title “commissioner”, within the SPCB supported bodies there are commissioners but there are also, for example, ombudsmen, and there are roles outwith the SPCB supported bodies that have the title “commissioner”. Is the title “commissioner” useful for describing your role or all the roles that are covered by that title?

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review

Meeting date: 20 February 2025

Lorna Slater

I absolutely understand the importance of the independence aspect. When we were speaking with the Ethical Standards Commissioner and the Standards Commission for Scotland, they spoke about the importance to them of separating the investigative role from the adjudication role. However, for your role, the two are combined. I am just trying to understand why it is different for them from how it is for you.

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review

Meeting date: 20 February 2025

Lorna Slater

Thank you.

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review

Meeting date: 20 February 2025

Lorna Slater

Thank you.

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review

Meeting date: 20 February 2025

Lorna Slater

Not at all. In this landscape review we do not just want to look at overlaps, we want to look at where there are potential gaps.

We all have biometric passports now. We can imagine a future in which payment systems are biometric or library cards have biometrics. We can imagine biometrics becoming a standard identification technique. When we imagine that landscape, we need to make sure that gaps are covered and that the system is robust, so that there is no instinct to create a new commission every time a new thing is developed. So, I appreciate your answer on that.

I have a question to help me to make sure that I have not made a mistake. Many of the other commissioners and SPCB supported bodies that we have spoken to have very public-facing roles. Am I right that your role is entirely, or nearly entirely, not public? The public do not come to you when they have a problem; your role is about supporting the police.

Economy and Fair Work Committee

New Deal for Business

Meeting date: 19 February 2025

Lorna Slater

Colin Borland, that question was not put directly to you, but do you have any thoughts, before I move on?

Economy and Fair Work Committee

New Deal for Business

Meeting date: 19 February 2025

Lorna Slater

The witnesses have sort of answered what was going to be my second question, so I will deviate a bit.

When you notice challenges, whether those are as simple as a drop-down menu—although I know that such things are never simple—or an issue such as Business Gateway or the enterprise agencies just not directing people down that path, who do you go to? I ask because you were not part of the new deal for business group, so do you have a mechanism to flag that up and say to Scottish Enterprise that it has not included you?