The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 867 contributions
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 20 February 2025
Lorna Slater
In my final question, I will take a slightly different approach. Some other witnesses, to whom the committee spoke about ethical standards and ombudsmen, talked about the fact that, because they interact with the broader public, it is not always clear to a member of the public who has a frustration—whether it relates to their GP, the Parliament or a member of their local council—whom to go to. Those witnesses talked about creating a one-stop shop—a website or portal, for example—where a person could enter their problem, then, behind the scenes, the one-stop shop would direct them to the public trust body that would most likely be able to help them. Could your office participate in something like that? Would that help the public who use your services or would that not be relevant to you?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 20 February 2025
Lorna Slater
I am interested in following up on something that you said. I completely understand your cautioning us against lumping together all the SPCB supported bodies. One way to look at the landscape is that some have a public trust role and others primarily have an advocacy role. Clearly, the role of the Scottish Information Commissioner, along with the role of the ombudsman, is really important for public trust. Some of the other witnesses that we have heard from talked about the importance for their role of the separation between an investigative role and an adjudication role. It sounds as though you do both investigation and adjudication. Will you outline those aspects and why they are particularly important to your role?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 20 February 2025
Lorna Slater
Thank you.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 20 February 2025
Lorna Slater
One of my follow-up questions relates to something that you alluded to earlier. With regard to the title “commissioner”, within the SPCB supported bodies there are commissioners but there are also, for example, ombudsmen, and there are roles outwith the SPCB supported bodies that have the title “commissioner”. Is the title “commissioner” useful for describing your role or all the roles that are covered by that title?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 20 February 2025
Lorna Slater
I absolutely understand the importance of the independence aspect. When we were speaking with the Ethical Standards Commissioner and the Standards Commission for Scotland, they spoke about the importance to them of separating the investigative role from the adjudication role. However, for your role, the two are combined. I am just trying to understand why it is different for them from how it is for you.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 20 February 2025
Lorna Slater
Thank you.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 20 February 2025
Lorna Slater
Thank you.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 20 February 2025
Lorna Slater
Not at all. In this landscape review we do not just want to look at overlaps, we want to look at where there are potential gaps.
We all have biometric passports now. We can imagine a future in which payment systems are biometric or library cards have biometrics. We can imagine biometrics becoming a standard identification technique. When we imagine that landscape, we need to make sure that gaps are covered and that the system is robust, so that there is no instinct to create a new commission every time a new thing is developed. So, I appreciate your answer on that.
I have a question to help me to make sure that I have not made a mistake. Many of the other commissioners and SPCB supported bodies that we have spoken to have very public-facing roles. Am I right that your role is entirely, or nearly entirely, not public? The public do not come to you when they have a problem; your role is about supporting the police.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Lorna Slater
Colin Borland, that question was not put directly to you, but do you have any thoughts, before I move on?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Lorna Slater
The witnesses have sort of answered what was going to be my second question, so I will deviate a bit.
When you notice challenges, whether those are as simple as a drop-down menu—although I know that such things are never simple—or an issue such as Business Gateway or the enterprise agencies just not directing people down that path, who do you go to? I ask because you were not part of the new deal for business group, so do you have a mechanism to flag that up and say to Scottish Enterprise that it has not included you?