The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 867 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 26 February 2025
Lorna Slater
Reporting is an incentive for taking things forward.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 26 February 2025
Lorna Slater
I have heard that the businesses that you represent are broadly on board. They understand that part of the wellbeing economy is about paying living wages and that the circular economy means looking at what happens to their waste and making their processes more efficient. People get it, but they are struggling with having the resources and bandwidth to actually do it. Is that a reasonable summary?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 26 February 2025
Lorna Slater
Is it my go?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 26 February 2025
Lorna Slater
The interesting conversation is about what businesses need, if science says that we have to do X, in order to get there. What is realistic for them?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 26 February 2025
Lorna Slater
Thank you, convener. My question is directed primarily to Tony Rodgers, because Nathalie Agnew, who talked about B corps, Claire Mack, who works in renewables, and Jane Wood, who pointed out that housing is highly regulated, all live within our bubble a bit. I am an electrical and mechanical engineer by trade, and I have spent many happy hours shining a little penlight down a fibre optic cable and shouting, “I’ve lit number 1. Which one’s coming up?”, so I get what you do and why it is important.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 26 February 2025
Lorna Slater
What do terms such as “wellbeing economy”, “net zero” and “nature positive” mean to you, as a typical successful Scottish businessman? Do they mean anything to you? Do Scottish businesses know what they mean? Do you know what role you play in all that, or is it all just opaque?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 26 February 2025
Lorna Slater
That is a really interesting approach. Targets are set on the basis of—
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 20 February 2025
Lorna Slater
For those aspects that are public facing—when someone has a complaint or wants to come to you for information or because they have an issue with the police—something that we have talked about with other witnesses is the idea of having a one-stop shop.
If a citizen or resident of Scotland has a problem with a public service—maybe with the police—and they need help but do not know where to start because the landscape is complicated, would it be useful for them to have a one-stop shop or a single portal to access your services?
11:00SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 20 February 2025
Lorna Slater
We have talked a lot about the complicated landscape. Your role and the role of your office is the newest but also probably the most specific and the narrowest of these bodies. Would it be right to say that that is largely as a result of changes to technology and evidence-gathering methods? As we look ahead to the future of the landscape, we can imagine that new technologies, such as AI—goodness knows what else is ahead of us—might require other bits of data protection, better good practice by police and so on. If we are imagining a robust shape for this landscape such that, in the future, other things are required, do you imagine that something like that could be incorporated within your office? Would there be other commissioners? How do we make your function—or the role that you play in the wider landscape—robust in relation to future technological advance?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 20 February 2025
Lorna Slater
Obviously, the committee has been convened because of the complicated landscape. I absolutely accept your remarks that the wider picture is relevant. We have discussed that point and it might form part of our recommendations. However, we have a very limited remit and timeframe, and we have resources for a very specific bit of work.
You alluded briefly to, I think, the UK model, in which the freedom of information functions are within wider information commissioner functions. Are there other international models to consider? I understand what you said about the uniqueness of your role, and I totally get the point about the independence that is required. I am thinking in terms of structure and what we could do in a perfect world, if we were starting from somewhere other than where we are. Is there a model that has been shown to work in other countries, or does the role always need to be completely separate from other public bodies, for reasons of trust?