The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2703 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 18 September 2024
Sue Webber
I note for the record that Mark Priestley was nodding away in agreement to that.
Over to you again, Evelyn Tweed.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 18 September 2024
Sue Webber
Thank you very much, Professor Muir. We will now move to questions, kicking off with Liam Kerr.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 18 September 2024
Sue Webber
Following on from that theme and the point about deciding who will be involved, I note that we have seen in the responses to our call for views a large number of bids and pitches to be included in the committees and the work to prepare the charters. How on earth would the Scottish Government determine how it would select people in such a way that it was fair and representative and not exclusive?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 18 September 2024
Sue Webber
Thank you, Professor Muir. That is helpful.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 18 September 2024
Sue Webber
We now come to questions from Pam Duncan-Glancy.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 18 September 2024
Sue Webber
I apologise if I am repeating myself a bit, but I want to go back to an issue that Liam Kerr asked you about—the fact that the new qualifications body is to keep the functions of developing and awarding qualifications and dealing with accreditation in the same body. You were quite firm in your view that those should be separated. Why do you have such a strong position on that?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 18 September 2024
Sue Webber
My next question might be more all-encompassing. You spoke about the fast pace of the change that we are facing, but local government and organisations across Scotland are not renowned for their fast pace of change or fast adoption and implementation of things. Is the bill a mechanism that will allow that to happen? You said that there is a desire for change, but sometimes, when we get people in front of us as witnesses, they are very resistant to change. I am trying to figure out how we might manage that mismatch.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 18 September 2024
Sue Webber
I am sorry, Mr Rennie, but I must come to George Adam now. He has been waiting for the last group of questions.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 18 September 2024
Sue Webber
We have touched on the fact that there is a lot of focus on structural change and not really a focus on the cultural change that is needed. I will direct my question to Professor Priestley first. Do you agree that, to get that focus on the cultural change, we first need to restore the trust of the learners and teachers? Will the education reform bill do that and change the perception that people have about bodies marking their own homework? We heard that this morning from Professor Muir.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 18 September 2024
Sue Webber
Thank you for that.
Agenda item 1 is consideration of a piece of subordinate legislation. The purpose of this order of council, which is being considered under the negative procedure, is to specify Scotland’s Rural College as a higher education institution competent to grant degrees, diplomas, certificates and other academic awards or distinctions, not including those made on completion of a programme of supervised research.
If members have no comments to make, does the committee agree that it does not wish to make any recommendations on the order of council?
Members indicated agreement.