The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1411 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2025
Martin Whitfield
There will be a division.
For
FitzPatrick, Joe (Dundee City West) (SNP)
Mackay, Rona (Strathkelvin and Bearsden) (SNP)
Whitfield, Martin (South Scotland) (Lab)
Against
Webber, Sue (Lothian) (Con)
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2025
Martin Whitfield
Excellent. It is nice to see a petition achieve its aims.
10:56 Meeting continued in private until 11:17.Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2025
Martin Whitfield
In a more generic sense, what pathways exist for reviewing previous decisions?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2025
Martin Whitfield
I have a couple of points for clarification. You have said that the queue of MSP complaints that are waiting for assessment goes back to December, but your website—although this relates to the position in October 2024—makes reference to cases that go back to June, August and September. I presume that that will change at the end of the next quarter to show the figures that you have given today.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2025
Martin Whitfield
Please do.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2025
Martin Whitfield
I am grateful to hear that. We will assist and also persist.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2025
Martin Whitfield
Welcome back. Under agenda item 3, the committee will consider an application for a proposed cross-party group on France. We are joined by the proposed convener of the group, Daniel Johnson. I invite him to set out the background to the establishment of the group, its purposes and the issues that the group intends to address, following which he will take questions from the committee.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2025
Martin Whitfield
I simply found it interesting that an opinion was derived from the evidence on councillor complaints but not from that for complaints about MSPs.
My final question is on something that you will fully expect me to ask about, because we have discussed it at length: support for people who are complained about. We have had some reference to that already today. During your tenure, there have been amendments to clarify the obligations on individuals who are complained about. Are you getting any further forward, or are you sensing any support being available for people who are complained about? Are we anywhere other than where we were almost two years ago when we discussed this?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2025
Martin Whitfield
I refer you to the standing orders.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2025
Martin Whitfield
The strategic plan 2024-28 seems to very much underpin the route that you want to take, and you have explained how it was developed with stakeholders. I was looking back at the evidence that you gave last year, when the strategic plan was still being formulated, and one of the questions that former committee member Stephen Kerr asked was about stakeholder surveys. You said then that you had not surveyed stakeholders and that
“that is not something that I currently have planned.”—[Official Report, Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee, 14 March 2024; c 18.]
Is it not the case that it was, in effect, a stakeholder survey that led to the design of the 2024-28 plan?