The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1411 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2025
Martin Whitfield
Thank you, Ian, for coming and facing the questions and for the report. Over the time that I have had the privilege of sitting at this end of the table, there has been a sea change in the annual report and its contents, as well as in the confidence of external stakeholders and internal staff. I thank you and your staff for that.
I want to steal your words by reiterating the final part of your statement in the report, where you say that it is a privilege to lead the team that you lead. The committee can see that they are a talented and dedicated group of professionals. Your very last sentence,
“We know that day in and day out our work makes a difference to people’s lives and we don’t take that responsibility lightly”,
is a powerful statement for a lot of people within and outwith your organisation.
Thank you for your attendance.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2025
Martin Whitfield
Yes—we want robust discourse without the discourtesy.
As one of the commissioners, you are, of course, aware of the Scottish Parliament’s new SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee. Would you like to make any initial comments on its work? I have a few questions about what the commissioners have done to support one another and share resource, and about the challenges. You mentioned your cybersecurity certification, which is much to the credit of those who have worked on it. Do you have any comments on, first, the new committee’s inquiry and, secondly, the approach that you have taken, as a commissioner, with regard to your responsibilities, given the use of what is, at the end of the day, public money?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2025
Martin Whitfield
I have a couple of questions about the proposed group. First, I note that secretariat support will be provided by an individual in a personal rather than professional capacity. Is that right?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2025
Martin Whitfield
Thank you very much for that. We look forward to receiving your correspondence, and we will continue to aid and assist, which is the committee’s responsibility.
I will kick off with a few questions and then throw you to the lion’s den in the usual way. However, before I start, I want to pick up on something that happened at the tail end of last year, so that it is on the public record. It relates to the Standards Commission for Scotland and the section 10 direction on the outcome of investigations. As you said in your opening words, your office is in a very different position from that which it has been in in the past, which is absolutely to be welcomed.
Do you want to take the opportunity to explain what the section 10 direction was and, more important, why the Standards Commission for Scotland is happy for that direction now to fall by the wayside rather than be renewed?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2025
Martin Whitfield
The fact that it is lapsing is an indication not only that it has come to the end of its usefulness but that the purpose that sat behind it—in this case, the reporting of each investigation—is now hardwired into the system so that it cannot—
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2025
Martin Whitfield
Good morning. I welcome everyone to the first meeting in 2025 of the Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee.
We have received apologies from Ruth Maguire, and I welcome Rona Mackay, who is attending as a committee substitute. We have also received apologies from Annie Wells. I hope that both Ruth Maguire and Annie Wells recover soon.
Our first agenda item is a decision on taking business in private. Agenda item 6 is consideration of the evidence that the committee will hear from the Ethical Standards Commissioner. Are members content to take item 6 in private?
Members indicated agreement.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2025
Martin Whitfield
Our next agenda item is to hear from the Ethical Standards Commissioner. Good morning, Ian Bruce. I welcome you to the meeting, and I am happy to hand over to you for an introduction.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2025
Martin Whitfield
Thank you. The winding up of CPGs is certainly music to my ears, as it is appropriate.
Daniel, thank you for attending. We will consider the application under the next agenda item, and the clerks will contact you in the normal way. Thank you for your attendance today.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2025
Martin Whitfield
I echo that view. I am satisfied that he understands what his obligations would be.
Although this is technically not part of the process of recognising the CPG, I note that the committee has expressed significant concerns about MSPs’ workloads. Daniel Johnson’s frank comments about the secretariat were helpful.
Looking at the proposal for this cross-party group, I would have had absolutely no problem with the CPG had it been proposed in the early months of the parliamentary session; I see its benefit. However, to speak to your point, Sue, when we come to our inquiry, it should perhaps be recognised that a decision needs to be made about what the cut-off date for CPGs is.
With that in mind, are committee members inclined to consent, or do you want to make it more formal than that?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2025
Martin Whitfield
I am content to put it to a vote.
The question is, that we agree to the formal establishment of the CPG on France. Are we agreed?