The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1411 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 30 January 2025
Martin Whitfield
Our next item of business is evidence from the Scottish Information Commissioner. I suspend the meeting to allow for his attendance.
09:04 Meeting suspended.Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2025
Martin Whitfield
I suspend the meeting briefly before we move on to the next agenda item.
10:35 Meeting suspended.Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2025
Martin Whitfield
That brings me to my second and possibly slightly more challenging question. As the group’s proposed convener, you would have the responsibility for ensuring compliance with the rules that are set out. In this session, a number of cross-party groups have been very challenged by the rules, including one of your own—the cross-party group on the USA. Can you assure us that you have the capacity, both as an individual MSP and within your office, to meet the obligations of the existing CPGs that you are attached to and to take on this new CPG as well? After all, responsibility rests with MSPs personally.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2025
Martin Whitfield
I am very grateful for that clarification. That leads me to my first question, which is about public confidence and trust and your public profile as the commissioner. To what extent do you think that that has increased, deepened and strengthened as time has gone on?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2025
Martin Whitfield
Rona, would you like to come back on that?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2025
Martin Whitfield
The result of the division is: For 3, Against 1, Abstentions 0.
We agree to the formal establishment of the CPG on France.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2025
Martin Whitfield
Agenda item 5 is consideration of petition PE1949, which was lodged by Alexander James Dickson. It calls on the Scottish Parliament to urge the Scottish Government to review the rules concerning dual mandate MSPs.
The committee previously agreed to consider the petition as part of its scrutiny of the Scottish Elections Representation and Reform Bill. The committee included the issue as part of its scrutiny of the bill at stage 1, and members will be aware that amendments relating to the ending of dual mandates were also considered at stages 2 and 3. Amendments were agreed by the Parliament at stage 3 that require the Scottish ministers to lay regulations to give effect to disqualification of members of the House of Commons and the House of Lords, as well as providing a discretionary power to make regulations to give effect to disqualification of local authority councillors.
The Minister for Parliamentary Business committed to undertake a consultation and to report to Parliament once the consultation is concluded. The minister has indicated that he is
“committed to ensuring that, by autumn 2025, regulations are laid as informed by the consultation, which I have committed to publish, and that those regulations are in place well ahead of, and effective by, the Scottish Parliament election that is scheduled for May 2026.”—[Official Report, 17 December 2024; c 41.]
In the circumstances, it would appear that the petitioner’s request in the petition has, indeed, been answered. The committee might wish to note that, in discussions with the petitioner, he has indicated that he is content with the outcome that his petition has achieved.
We need to discuss whether or not we will formally close the petition under rule 15.7 of the standing orders, on the basis that the aims of the petition have been achieved through the passing of the Scottish Elections (Representation and Reform) Bill. Are we content to close the petition on that ground?
Members indicated agreement.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2025
Martin Whitfield
Is the committee content for me to write to the petitioner, confirming the committee’s decision?
Members indicated agreement.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2025
Martin Whitfield
Thank you, Rona. Over to you, Joe.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2025
Martin Whitfield
That is helpful.
I will turn to the second of my three points for clarification. The report gives a breakdown of where councillor complaints came from. There is the interesting issue of councillors complaining about councillors, as well as that of the public complaining about councillors, but there is no such breakdown for complaints about MSPs. Is that simply because the number of such complaints is very small, or is it because there is no interesting information that can be gathered from the sources?