The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1432 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 21 March 2024
Martin Whitfield
My last question relates to the postponement of elections. I know that a lot derives from policy, but your input would be helpful. If a postponement is being considered, there should be consultation. Are there any organisations that you would like to see on that consultation list before the decision is made?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 21 March 2024
Martin Whitfield
That is helpful.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 21 March 2024
Martin Whitfield
Malcolm, do you want to add anything?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 21 March 2024
Martin Whitfield
I understand that there is a policy dimension to this question, but I want to talk about the practicalities. Would automatic voter registration cause you any administration problems? I know that it would be a different landscape. Quite apart from than the policy decision about whether there should or should not be automatic voter registration, does anything about it concern you?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 21 March 2024
Martin Whitfield
That is fine. I am interested in it from the administrative point of view, so that we could have that on the record.
My other question is on an aspect that seems to be omitted from the bill, which is the emergency proxy vote, particularly for carers. I will come to you first, Andy Hunter, on the practical matters, and then to you, Malcolm Burr. What are your views on that situation? From my experience of running around on election day, that is the one question that keeps coming up, but no one seems to know the answer to it.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 21 March 2024
Martin Whitfield
From an administrative point of view, is the existing system fine? Could it take other applicants’ names being added to it without too much challenge?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 20 March 2024
Martin Whitfield
I thank the committee and the convener for allowing me to make this statement. It will be very short.
With the greatest respect, I suggest that a lot of the discussion is mixing two elements. One is whether the survivors who lodged the petition can enter the redress scheme. The second is whether, if they do enter the redress scheme, they can produce the evidence that is required. I think it would be helpful to separate those things.
I understand, from the Deputy First Minister’s answer to Foysol Choudhury, that it sits within her power to change the regulations and allow entry to the redress scheme. As, I think, Oliver Mundell pointed out, once the petitioners were in the redress scheme, it would be for the evidence to be balanced.
The First Minister gave the figure of 79 per cent for all those across Scotland who were in agreement with the remit of the redress scheme. Does the Deputy First Minister think that, if the people of Scotland understood this petition in the way that this committee does and in the way that the people who have attended today do, those 79 per cent would say they do not deserve redress?
10:30Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 29 February 2024
Martin Whitfield
Good morning, and welcome to the fifth meeting in 2024 of the Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee. This is only the second time that the committee—or its predecessors—has sat on a leap day. I have received no apologies.
Agenda item 1 is a decision on whether to take in private item 3, which is consideration of the evidence that we are about to hear from our witnesses. Is the committee content to take item 3 in private?
Members indicated agreement.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 29 February 2024
Martin Whitfield
I have.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 29 February 2024
Martin Whitfield
I am going to do that marvellous convener’s thing of referring to the pre-printed bit at the top of the script and say that I am conscious of the time.