The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1432 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 21 March 2024
Martin Whitfield
If we put aside the cause of the postponement, would a fixed, albeit longer, period rather than two shorter periods be helpful? Would it be helpful to know even before a postponement happens that it would be for a set period? Would that make the administration easier?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 21 March 2024
Martin Whitfield
Things would reset anyway.
Before I open up the topic to other witnesses, I want to ask about the recruitment of staff, which you highlighted as being one of the challenges. Do you want to explain why that is a challenge, given that there is not a significant number of people who only ever do election work and sit around in their holiday homes for the bits in between?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 21 March 2024
Martin Whitfield
Do you have a short question, Stephen, or has it been answered?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 21 March 2024
Martin Whitfield
That is very helpful.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 21 March 2024
Martin Whitfield
Thank you. I absolutely respect that there is a policy element in contrast to the implementation aspect.
You said that one possible amendment would involve individuals having limited leave to remain for the full period of the proposed office. Are you able to comment on whether that is a practical solution, given that those who are granted limited leave to remain are given varied periods of time and that there is certainly no consideration of electoral office cycles in that discussion?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 21 March 2024
Martin Whitfield
No, I appreciate that.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 21 March 2024
Martin Whitfield
I have no problem with that.
The proposal received significant support in the committee’s consultation on the bill and, prior to that, in the Government’s consultation on electoral reform. Malcolm Burr, leaving aside any problem with the policy decision, you see there being two practical problems with the proposal. Probably the most concerning would be a rise in the number of by-elections, which cost money and are problematic within the structure. The other problem relates to being able to identify, at the time of an election, whether there is likely to be a problem coming down the line with limited leave either expiring or being rescinded. Your comments are very helpful.
I will now hand you over—throw you on the mercy of—the committee. I go to Stephen Kerr first, and then to Ivan McKee, who will carry on with the next block of questions.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 21 March 2024
Martin Whitfield
Is there a resource implication, or is it a principle that returning officers should accept what is presented to them by an individual or the supporting team around them?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 21 March 2024
Martin Whitfield
Would it be helpful or otherwise if postponement, rather than just being a pause for a period, reset the clock? Let us say we were four weeks into what is colloquially called the short campaign and there was a postponement for a period. When the clock restarted, would it make any difference from a practical point of view if you had to deliver within the remaining two weeks or restart the full six-week short campaign?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 21 March 2024
Martin Whitfield
I will explore that a little bit. If you are not in a position to advise at the moment, I am more than happy for you to come back to us in writing. Do you think that time should, in essence, freeze during a postponement, with no additional people being allowed to come on to the register, or would it be better to accept that the passage of time during a postponement means that people are entitled to come on to and, indeed, come off the register? From an administrative, non-policy position, which would be the best approach?